You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Robert Menschel <Ro...@Menschel.net> on 2006/01/11 03:37:43 UTC

Re[2]: rules better than bayes?

Hello Chris,

Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 7:50:45 AM, you wrote:

CS> This is going to sound like tooting our own horn, but so be
CS> it. Before SARE, Bayes was cool. After SARE, I see no need.

Sorry Chris, as one Ninja to another, Bayes is your (well, my) friend.

I'll agree that with SA and network tests and SARE, we hit 98%. With
Bayes added to the mix we get 99.5%.  1.5% of 300,000 emails a week =
an additional 4500 spam identified.

Bob Menschel