You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to j-dev@xerces.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/11/26 09:52:17 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5076] New: - Don't wrap RuntimeExceptions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5076>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5076

Don't wrap RuntimeExceptions

           Summary: Don't wrap RuntimeExceptions
           Product: Xerces2-J
           Version: 2.0.0 [beta 2]
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: XNI
        AssignedTo: xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org
        ReportedBy: jjc@jclark.com


org.apache.xerces.parsers.StandardParserConfiguration.parse (both methods) has 
the code

        catch (Exception ex) {
            if (PRINT_EXCEPTION_STACK_TRACE)
                ex.printStackTrace();
            throw new XNIException(ex);
        }

This is annoying and inconvenient. If my code has a bug and
accordingly throws a RuntimeException, instead of getting a useful
stack trace showing what the exception was and where it occurred, I
get a useless stack trace saying an XNIException occurred in
StandardParserConfiguration. I would suggest that RuntimeExceptions
not be wrapped, i.e.

        catch (RuntimeException ex) {
            if (PRINT_EXCEPTION_STACK_TRACE)
                ex.printStackTrace();
            throw ex;
        }

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-j-dev-help@xml.apache.org