Re: Threaded discussion

[Steve Graham <sg...@us.ibm.com>]

Yuhichi:
I had the same thoughts as you.  I have asked around and will post
something if there is a good solution for us Notes users.

++++++++
Steve Graham
sggraham@us.ibm.com
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
<<Pithecanthropus Erectus>>
Emerging Internet Technologies
++++++++


"Yuhichi Nakamura" <NA...@jp.ibm.com> on 12/30/2000 12:54:33 AM

Please respond to soap-dev@xml.apache.org

To:   soap-dev@xml.apache.org
cc:
Subject:  Re: Threaded discussion




Glen,
It's fine with me.  The only problem I have is how to insert "XXX>" with
Lotus Notes :-(

By copy to Lotus Notes users (especailly IBMers),
Would you let me know the mean with Notes?

Best regards,

Yuhichi Nakamura
IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
Tel: +81-46-215-4668
FAX: +81-46-215-7413


From: "Glen Daniels" <gd...@allaire.com> on 2000/12/22 18:47

Please respond to soap-dev@xml.apache.org

To:   <so...@xml.apache.org>
cc:
Subject:  Threaded discussion



Hi folks:

Does anyone else find the <initials></initials> style of threaded replies
to be
difficult to read?  I can see the utility in terms of searching, but I
think it
becomes a bit unclear for long threads, and you need to use a numbering (or
equivalent) idiom to identify multi-level replies.

If others are psyched about the <> pattern, I can certainly live with it,
but
I'd like to propose that we consider using the standard (and, IMHO more
effective) indented ">" syntax for threading on the list.

--Glen