You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@empire-db.apache.org by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/01 22:22:44 UTC
codegen convenience methods?
Hi,
The templates for the codegen create 2 extra convenience methods:
findRecord(...) and findRecords(...)
Should we provide those in DBDatabase instead of generating them? I
propose to or remove them or put them in DBDatabase. What do you guys
think?
Cheers,
Francis
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Re: codegen convenience methods?
Posted by Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>.
They are out, further I cleaned up the templates a bit so that the
generated code looks more like our example code
Cheers,
Francis
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:17 AM, <be...@arcor.de> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i'd prefer to keep it small and simple, and i think they don't add much value to the generated classes.
> So my vote is
>
> remove
>
> I'm currently in an audit perioud of my studies ... so i have not much time the next 3 weeks. But i'll be back soon.
>
> Best Regards,
> Benjamin
>
>
> ----- Original Nachricht ----
> Von: Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>
> An: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Datum: 01.02.2010 22:22
> Betreff: codegen convenience methods?
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The templates for the codegen create 2 extra convenience methods:
>> findRecord(...) and findRecords(...)
>> Should we provide those in DBDatabase instead of generating them? I
>> propose to or remove them or put them in DBDatabase. What do you guys
>> think?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Francis
>>
>> --
>> http://www.somatik.be
>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>>
>
> Immer auf dem Laufenden! Sport, Auto, Reise, Politik und Promis. Von uns für Sie: der neue Arcor.de-Newsletter!
> Jetzt anmelden und einfach alles wissen: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.newsletter
>
--
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
Aw: codegen convenience methods?
Posted by be...@arcor.de.
Hi there,
i'd prefer to keep it small and simple, and i think they don't add much value to the generated classes.
So my vote is
remove
I'm currently in an audit perioud of my studies ... so i have not much time the next 3 weeks. But i'll be back soon.
Best Regards,
Benjamin
----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Francis De Brabandere <fr...@gmail.com>
An: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: 01.02.2010 22:22
Betreff: codegen convenience methods?
> Hi,
>
> The templates for the codegen create 2 extra convenience methods:
> findRecord(...) and findRecords(...)
> Should we provide those in DBDatabase instead of generating them? I
> propose to or remove them or put them in DBDatabase. What do you guys
> think?
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
>
Immer auf dem Laufenden! Sport, Auto, Reise, Politik und Promis. Von uns für Sie: der neue Arcor.de-Newsletter!
Jetzt anmelden und einfach alles wissen: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.newsletter
re: codegen convenience methods?
Posted by Rainer Döbele <do...@esteam.de>.
Those are not in line with Empire-db's philosophy and they might seduce people to take the wrong approach.
Hence my vote is: remove.
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> re: codegen convenience methods?
>
> Hi,
>
> The templates for the codegen create 2 extra convenience methods:
> findRecord(...) and findRecords(...)
> Should we provide those in DBDatabase instead of generating them? I
> propose to or remove them or put them in DBDatabase. What do you guys
> think?
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> --
> http://www.somatik.be
> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.