You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/04/20 18:09:20 UTC

[Bug 1432] New - keep-with-* not functioning for fo:table-row

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1432

*** shadow/1432	Fri Apr 20 09:09:20 2001
--- shadow/1432.tmp.7520	Fri Apr 20 09:09:20 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,25 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | keep-with-* not functioning for fo:table-row                               |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |        Bug #: 1432                        Product: Fop                     |
+ |       Status: NEW                         Version: 0.17                    |
+ |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
+ |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: Linux                   |
+ |     Priority:                           Component: general                 |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |  Assigned To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org                                       |
+ |  Reported By: scott@finnerty.org                                           |
+ |      CC list: Cc:                                                          |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |          URL:                                                              |
+ +============================================================================+
+ |                              DESCRIPTION                                   |
+ Using keep-with-next.within-column or keep-with-previous.within-column is not 
+ functioning for fo:table-row's.
+ 
+ I found that in the TableRow.getKeepValue() method the switch is using literal 
+ integers for the cases - instead of the class variables created for 
+ the "ALWAYS" and "AUTO" values for this attribute during the codegen phase.
+ 
+ I was able to fix by replacing "case 2:" with "case Constants.ALWAYS:" 
+ and "case 1:" with "case Constants.AUTO:".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org