CppCalculator debug error

[Prashanth Rao <pr...@gmail.com>]

Hi


I am running the CPPCalculator sample (from the samples/VSexpress folder).
When i run the VC++ project in debug mode, I get the following error, when
executing this line

*osoa::sca::CompositeContext myContext =
osoa::sca::CompositeContext::getCurrent();
Calculator *calcService = (Calculator*) myContext.locateService
("CalculatorComponent/CalculatorService");*
*
*
The error is:
"Unhandled exception at 0x7817fe62 (msvcr80.dll) in calculator_client.exe:
0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xcccccccc."


Can someone pls help me solve this.. I see that the VC++ project properties
for build has all the required envt variables set.. including
TUSCANY_SCACPP_ROOT etc. But still not able to run this.. even if i use the
.DLL and the .exe generated through this project crashes!

I am using windows XP and VC++ 2005 studio (prof edn)


Thanks
Prashanth

Re: CppCalculator debug error

[Adriano Crestani <ad...@apache.org>]

Hi,

Have you tried on release mode? Did it work?

Regards,
Adriano Crestani

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Prashanth Rao <pr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> I am running the CPPCalculator sample (from the samples/VSexpress folder).
> When i run the VC++ project in debug mode, I get the following error, when
> executing this line
>
> *osoa::sca::CompositeContext myContext =
> osoa::sca::CompositeContext::getCurrent();
> Calculator *calcService = (Calculator*) myContext.locateService
> ("CalculatorComponent/CalculatorService");*
> *
> *
> The error is:
> "Unhandled exception at 0x7817fe62 (msvcr80.dll) in calculator_client.exe:
> 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xcccccccc."
>
>
> Can someone pls help me solve this.. I see that the VC++ project
> properties
> for build has all the required envt variables set.. including
> TUSCANY_SCACPP_ROOT etc. But still not able to run this.. even if i use
> the
> .DLL and the .exe generated through this project crashes!
>
> I am using windows XP and VC++ 2005 studio (prof edn)
>
>
> Thanks
> Prashanth
>