You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@druid.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/01/29 22:35:10 UTC
[GitHub] gianm commented on issue #6934: Consistent naming of 'no-op',
'empty' aggregators
gianm commented on issue #6934: Consistent naming of 'no-op', 'empty' aggregators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6934#issuecomment-458735048
I don't think there's much of a real difference. All of the classes you mentioned are doing the same kind of thing: returning empty/null placeholder objects from `get` and not doing anything on `aggregate`.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@druid.apache.org