You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2006/12/27 18:22:40 UTC
openejb2 code in openejb3
Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work remains
to be done?
Regards,
Alan
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 29, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 29, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/27/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>>> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
>>>>> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work
>>>>> remains
>>>>> to be done?
>>>>
>>>> If you're lucky not to break anything, I'd say go ahead and unplug
>>>> some parts of OpenEJB 2 matrix from the bone.
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's what I was thinking. It's really hard for someone
>>> who didn't set up openejb3 to understand what is meant for v3 and
>>> what is not. I accidentally started groking the wrong container.
>>
>> I'm going to be starting with the Geronimo integration sometime
>> next week, so you may want to just wait.
>
> Sure, no problem. I should have posted my questions to this list
> in the first place anyway.
>
Thinks are looking more concrete in the integration area, so I'd say
the timing is now good. Going to kill what I can.
-David
> Regards,
> Alan
>
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Dec 29, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/27/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
>>>> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work
>>>> remains
>>>> to be done?
>>>
>>> If you're lucky not to break anything, I'd say go ahead and unplug
>>> some parts of OpenEJB 2 matrix from the bone.
>>
>> Yeah, that's what I was thinking. It's really hard for someone
>> who didn't set up openejb3 to understand what is meant for v3 and
>> what is not. I accidentally started groking the wrong container.
>
> I'm going to be starting with the Geronimo integration sometime
> next week, so you may want to just wait.
Sure, no problem. I should have posted my questions to this list in
the first place anyway.
Regards,
Alan
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Dec 29, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
>> On 12/27/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
>>> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work
>>> remains
>>> to be done?
>>
>> If you're lucky not to break anything, I'd say go ahead and unplug
>> some parts of OpenEJB 2 matrix from the bone.
>
> Yeah, that's what I was thinking. It's really hard for someone who
> didn't set up openejb3 to understand what is meant for v3 and what
> is not. I accidentally started groking the wrong container.
I'm going to be starting with the Geronimo integration sometime next
week, so you may want to just wait.
-dain
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 12/27/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
>> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work remains
>> to be done?
>
> If you're lucky not to break anything, I'd say go ahead and unplug
> some parts of OpenEJB 2 matrix from the bone.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. It's really hard for someone who
didn't set up openejb3 to understand what is meant for v3 and what is
not. I accidentally started groking the wrong container.
Regards,
Alan
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 12/27/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work remains
> to be done?
If you're lucky not to break anything, I'd say go ahead and unplug
some parts of OpenEJB 2 matrix from the bone.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.jaceklaskowski.pl
Re: openejb2 code in openejb3
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Would it be a good idea to remove the openejb2 code in openejb3 so
> that it's clear what code goes, what code stays and what work
> remains to be done?
The code is still getting referenced heavily at the moment. I
imagine once the first openejb3 integration with geronimo is done,
we'll flush any unused code.
-David