You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2008/01/14 15:47:15 UTC
[Bug 5783] New: MANIFEST update for new rules file
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
Summary: MANIFEST update for new rules file
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.4
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: Building & Packaging
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: jm@jmason.org
I added rules/72_removed.cf; this requires a MANIFEST update:
Index: MANIFEST
===================================================================
--- MANIFEST (revision 611819)
+++ MANIFEST (working copy)
@@ -507,3 +507,4 @@
t/spamd_user_rules_leak.t
t/get_all_headers.t
t/data/Dumpheaders.pm
+rules/72_removed.cf
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5783] [review] MANIFEST update for new rules file
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
------- Additional Comments From sidney@sidney.com 2008-01-14 07:05 -------
+1
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5783] [review] MANIFEST update for new rules file
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|MANIFEST update for new |[review] MANIFEST update for
|rules file |new rules file
Status Whiteboard| |needs 2 votes for 3.2
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.5
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5783] [review] MANIFEST update for new rules file
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2008-01-14 15:18 -------
thanks guys -- applied. I agree, CTR makes most sense in this situation
in future.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5783] [review] MANIFEST update for new rules file
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
spamassassin@dostech.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes for 3.2 |go
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5783] [review] MANIFEST update for new rules file
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2008-01-14 10:37 -------
+1
BTW, I'm fine with CTR for rule related MANIFEST updates given that rules are
CTR. In fact I'd prefer rule files don't get added separately from the MANIFEST
update so that the MANIFEST update doesn't get forgotten.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.