You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@logging.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2016/05/19 15:29:57 UTC

logging-log4j2 git commit: LOG4J2-1179 performance page minor edit

Repository: logging-log4j2
Updated Branches:
  refs/heads/master 30d997d33 -> b83bb632a


LOG4J2-1179 performance page minor edit


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/commit/b83bb632
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/tree/b83bb632
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/diff/b83bb632

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: b83bb632a1f703a2b19147d9609585683d437391
Parents: 30d997d
Author: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Authored: Fri May 20 00:30:34 2016 +0900
Committer: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Committed: Fri May 20 00:30:34 2016 +0900

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 src/site/xdoc/performance.xml | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/blob/b83bb632/src/site/xdoc/performance.xml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/src/site/xdoc/performance.xml b/src/site/xdoc/performance.xml
index f1cc273..ff892fa 100644
--- a/src/site/xdoc/performance.xml
+++ b/src/site/xdoc/performance.xml
@@ -195,8 +195,9 @@ if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
         and as a result it is very fast when single-threaded.
         However, when more application threads are logging concurrently, the cost of lock contention outweighs this gain.</p>
       <p>In absolute numbers, <em>Log4j 2's Async Loggers perform well compared to the other logging
-        frameworks, but notice that the message formatting cost increases with the number of parameters.
-        In this area, Log4j 2 still has work to do to improve.</em></p>
+        frameworks, but notice that the message formatting cost increases sharply with the number of parameters.
+        In this area, Log4j 2 still has work to do to improve: we would like to keep this cost more constant.</em>
+      </p>
       <p><img src="images/ParamMsgThrpt1-4T.png" /></p>
       <p>The results above are for JUL (java.util.logging) 1.8.0_45, Log4j 2.6, Log4j 1.2.17 and Logback 1.1.7,
         and were obtained with the