You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Matthias J. Sax (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/12/06 19:55:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-4767) KafkaProducer is not joining its IO
thread properly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16280793#comment-16280793 ]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-4767:
----------------------------------------
Can we close this? Seems to be resolved via KAFKA-5936 ?
> KafkaProducer is not joining its IO thread properly
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-4767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4767
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: producer
> Affects Versions: 0.10.2.0
> Reporter: Buğra Gedik
> Assignee: huxihx
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.1.0, 1.0.1, 0.11.0.3
>
>
> The {{KafkaProducer}} is not properly joining the thread it creates. The code is like this:
> {code}
> try {
> this.ioThread.join(timeUnit.toMillis(timeout));
> } catch (InterruptedException t) {
> firstException.compareAndSet(null, t);
> log.error("Interrupted while joining ioThread", t);
> }
> {code}
> If the code is interrupted while performing the join, it will end up leaving the io thread running. The correct way of handling this is a follows:
> {code}
> try {
> this.ioThread.join(timeUnit.toMillis(timeout));
> } catch (InterruptedException t) {
> // propagate the interrupt
> this.ioThread.interrupt();
> try {
> this.ioThread.join();
> } catch (InterruptedException t) {
> firstException.compareAndSet(null, t);
> log.error("Interrupted while joining ioThread", t);
> } finally {
> // make sure we maintain the interrupted status
> Thread.currentThread.interrupt();
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)