Interceptors decoupling : done

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

I finally successfully decoupled all the interceptors. The subtree 
interceptor is not anymore referenced by the authz and trigger 
interceptors. I moved some of the subtree and event classes to the 
core-api project, and added the subentryCache and evaluator to the 
DirectoryService instances. It works well.

I thought it would be more complex that it was, but hopefully, it was 
quite straightforward... Surprisingly, 6 years later, the architecture 
is still good enough :)

The next step will be to modify the way we handle bypass (there is 
another thread of discussion about this).

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: Interceptors decoupling : done

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

Thanks Emm! Great work ... I thought it would be a nightmare but you handled
this effortlessly.

Regards,
Alex

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I finally successfully decoupled all the interceptors. The subtree
> interceptor is not anymore referenced by the authz and trigger interceptors.
> I moved some of the subtree and event classes to the core-api project, and
> added the subentryCache and evaluator to the DirectoryService instances. It
> works well.
>
> I thought it would be more complex that it was, but hopefully, it was quite
> straightforward... Surprisingly, 6 years later, the architecture is still
> good enough :)
>
> The next step will be to modify the way we handle bypass (there is another
> thread of discussion about this).
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex