You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@aurora.apache.org by "brian wickman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/24 18:33:05 UTC
[jira] [Created] (AURORA-1370) reconsider the behavior of transient
task states now that we have task reconciliation
brian wickman created AURORA-1370:
-------------------------------------
Summary: reconsider the behavior of transient task states now that we have task reconciliation
Key: AURORA-1370
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1370
Project: Aurora
Issue Type: Story
Components: Scheduler
Reporter: brian wickman
Now that we have task reconciliation, it's less clear that transient task states (e.g. KILLING) are necessary or should behave in the same way. We have discussed things like extending the escalation timeout for the executor's HTTP lifecycle workflow (i.e. /quitquitquit, /abortabortabort) but doing so would possibly conflict with transient task timeouts. If we could relax the transient task timeout through task reconciliation, then it may be safer to do give more flexibility to the task.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)