You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by na...@reactor8.com on 2016/03/27 20:31:31 UTC

hive 2.x support

Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0
release:

 

-------------------

15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶
<http://hive.apache.org/downloads.html#15-february-2016-release-200-availabl
e> 

This release works with Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be
maintained with Hadoop 1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA
change log for this release
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12332641&sty
leName=Text&projectId=12310843> .

-------------------------------

Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner than
later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?

Re: hive 2.x support

Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
I think it is a viable plan to have all these updated in 1.2
Shall we?

Cos

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:33PM, 김영우 (Youngwoo Kim) wrote:
> Internally, I evaluated Hive 2.x with the rest of current Bigtop stack. we
> should consider bumping up Tez and HBase to appropriate versions along with
> Hive 2.x. It works fine so far but tests are going on...
> 
> - Youngwoo
> 
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, <na...@reactor8.com> wrote:
> 
> > Nice, didn’t see BIGTOP-2349.  We had client mention hive2 so will direct
> > our guys to look into BIGTOP-2349 and any other related pop up if they want
> > to move forward on it
> >
> > Sounded like from language in news announcement that any future Hadoop2
> > items would go into hive2, leaving hive 1.x for only maintenance around
> > hadoop1 patching.  Seems we might not be too far off where we have similar
> > issue similar to spark 1.x vs spark 2 support and different users wanting
> > latest stable, while others need/want to be on previous stable
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olaf Flebbe [mailto:of@oflebbe.de]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 1:37 PM
> > To: user@bigtop.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: hive 2.x support
> >
> > Hive 1.x supported Hadoop 2 as well.
> >
> > We already have a first ticket for Hive 2 :
> >  BIGTOP-2349
> >
> > And yes, we should move to hive 2, sooner or later.
> >
> > Olaf
> >
> >
> > > Am 27.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb nate@reactor8.com:
> > >
> > > Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0
> > release:
> > >
> > > -------------------
> > > 15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶ This release works with
> > > Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be maintained with Hadoop
> > 1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA change log for this
> > release.
> > >
> > > -------------------------------
> > >
> > > Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner
> > than later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?
> > >
> >
> >
> >

Re: hive 2.x support

Posted by "김영우 (Youngwoo Kim)" <wa...@gmail.com>.
Internally, I evaluated Hive 2.x with the rest of current Bigtop stack. we
should consider bumping up Tez and HBase to appropriate versions along with
Hive 2.x. It works fine so far but tests are going on...

- Youngwoo

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:09 AM, <na...@reactor8.com> wrote:

> Nice, didn’t see BIGTOP-2349.  We had client mention hive2 so will direct
> our guys to look into BIGTOP-2349 and any other related pop up if they want
> to move forward on it
>
> Sounded like from language in news announcement that any future Hadoop2
> items would go into hive2, leaving hive 1.x for only maintenance around
> hadoop1 patching.  Seems we might not be too far off where we have similar
> issue similar to spark 1.x vs spark 2 support and different users wanting
> latest stable, while others need/want to be on previous stable
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olaf Flebbe [mailto:of@oflebbe.de]
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 1:37 PM
> To: user@bigtop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: hive 2.x support
>
> Hive 1.x supported Hadoop 2 as well.
>
> We already have a first ticket for Hive 2 :
>  BIGTOP-2349
>
> And yes, we should move to hive 2, sooner or later.
>
> Olaf
>
>
> > Am 27.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb nate@reactor8.com:
> >
> > Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0
> release:
> >
> > -------------------
> > 15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶ This release works with
> > Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be maintained with Hadoop
> 1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA change log for this
> release.
> >
> > -------------------------------
> >
> > Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner
> than later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?
> >
>
>
>

RE: hive 2.x support

Posted by na...@reactor8.com.
Nice, didn’t see BIGTOP-2349.  We had client mention hive2 so will direct
our guys to look into BIGTOP-2349 and any other related pop up if they want
to move forward on it

Sounded like from language in news announcement that any future Hadoop2
items would go into hive2, leaving hive 1.x for only maintenance around
hadoop1 patching.  Seems we might not be too far off where we have similar
issue similar to spark 1.x vs spark 2 support and different users wanting
latest stable, while others need/want to be on previous stable

-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf Flebbe [mailto:of@oflebbe.de] 
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 1:37 PM
To: user@bigtop.apache.org
Subject: Re: hive 2.x support

Hive 1.x supported Hadoop 2 as well.

We already have a first ticket for Hive 2 :
 BIGTOP-2349

And yes, we should move to hive 2, sooner or later.

Olaf


> Am 27.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb nate@reactor8.com:
> 
> Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0
release:
> 
> -------------------
> 15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶ This release works with 
> Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be maintained with Hadoop
1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA change log for this
release.
> 
> -------------------------------
> 
> Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner
than later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?
>

Re: hive 2.x support

Posted by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>.
Hive 1.x supported Hadoop 2 as well.

We already have a first ticket for Hive 2 :
 BIGTOP-2349

And yes, we should move to hive 2, sooner or later.

Olaf


> Am 27.03.2016 um 20:31 schrieb nate@reactor8.com:
> 
> Was catching up on news from other projects, noticed this from Hive 2.0 release:
> 
> -------------------
> 15 February 2016 : release 2.0.0 available¶
> This release works with Hadoop 2.x.y. Hive 1.x line will continue to be maintained with Hadoop 1.x.y support. You can look at the complete JIRA change log for this release.
> 
> -------------------------------
> 
> Assuming this means that Hadoop 2 users should move to Hive 2.x sooner than later.  Whats groups thought on moving bigtop version of hive to 2.x?
>