You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Dave Reynolds (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/16 09:25:16 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-416) Incorrect handling of maxcard(0) in presence of disjointness

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dave Reynolds closed JENA-416.
------------------------------

    
> Incorrect handling of maxcard(0)  in presence of disjointness
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-416
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Reasoners
>            Reporter: Dave Reynolds
>            Assignee: Dave Reynolds
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 2.10.1
>
>         Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> Rules maxrec2 and cardrec1 are too strong, they deduce an owl:equivalentClass relation where only rdfs:subClassOf is justified. Applies to both MINI and RULE configurations.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira