You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/06 11:54:42 UTC

[GitHub] [groovy] paulk-asert commented on a change in pull request #1394: GROOVY-9769: avoid unnecessary creation of UnionTypeClassNode

paulk-asert commented on a change in pull request #1394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1394#discussion_r500214643



##########
File path: src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java
##########
@@ -2265,26 +2265,27 @@ protected MethodNode typeCheckMapConstructor(final ConstructorCallExpression cal
         ).toArray(ClassNode[]::new);
     }
 
-    private ClassNode getInferredTypeFromTempInfo(final Expression exp, ClassNode result) {
-        if (exp instanceof VariableExpression && !typeCheckingContext.temporaryIfBranchTypeInformation.isEmpty()) {
-            List<ClassNode> classNodes = getTemporaryTypesForExpression(exp);
-            if (classNodes != null && !classNodes.isEmpty()) {
-                List<ClassNode> types = new ArrayList<>(classNodes.size() + 1);
-                if (result != null && !classNodes.contains(result)) types.add(result);
-                types.addAll(classNodes);
-                // GROOVY-7333: filter out Object
-                types.removeIf(OBJECT_TYPE::equals);
+    private ClassNode getInferredTypeFromTempInfo(final Expression expression, final ClassNode expressionType) {
+        if (expression instanceof VariableExpression && !typeCheckingContext.temporaryIfBranchTypeInformation.isEmpty()) {
+            List<ClassNode> tempTypes = getTemporaryTypesForExpression(expression);
+            if (tempTypes != null && !tempTypes.isEmpty()) {
+                List<ClassNode> types = new ArrayList<>(tempTypes.size() + 1);
+                if (expressionType != null && !expressionType.equals(ClassHelper.OBJECT_TYPE) // GROOVY-7333

Review comment:
       Removing `Object` is currently the correct behavior but I noticed last time that I played around with introducing Intersection types (as an addition to the current Union types) that we had to leave it in but fix in other places for things to work nicely.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org