You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "mark-bathori (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/04/11 08:45:43 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] mark-bathori opened a new pull request, #7161: NIFI-11334: PutIceberg processor instance interference due same class loader usage

mark-bathori opened a new pull request, #7161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7161

   <!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more -->
   <!-- contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with -->
   <!-- this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. -->
   <!-- The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 -->
   <!-- (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with -->
   <!-- the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at -->
   <!--     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
   <!-- Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software -->
   <!-- distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, -->
   <!-- WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. -->
   <!-- See the License for the specific language governing permissions and -->
   <!-- limitations under the License. -->
   
   # Summary
   
   [NIFI-11334](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11334)
   
   # Tracking
   
   Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.
   
   ### Issue Tracking
   
   - [x] [Apache NiFi Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI) issue created
   
   ### Pull Request Tracking
   
   - [ ] Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as `NIFI-00000`
   - [ ] Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such `NIFI-00000`
   
   ### Pull Request Formatting
   
   - [ ] Pull Request based on current revision of the `main` branch
   - [ ] Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes
   
   # Verification
   
   Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.
   
   ### Build
   
   - [x] Build completed using `mvn clean install -P contrib-check`
     - [x] JDK 11
     - [ ] JDK 17
   
   ### Licensing
   
   - [ ] New dependencies are compatible with the [Apache License 2.0](https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) according to the [License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html)
   - [ ] New dependencies are documented in applicable `LICENSE` and `NOTICE` files
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [nifi] mattyb149 closed pull request #7161: NIFI-11334: PutIceberg processor instance interference due same class loader usage

Posted by "mattyb149 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattyb149 closed pull request #7161: NIFI-11334: PutIceberg processor instance interference due same class loader usage
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7161


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [nifi] turcsanyip commented on pull request #7161: NIFI-11334: PutIceberg processor instance interference due same class loader usage

Posted by "turcsanyip (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
turcsanyip commented on PR #7161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7161#issuecomment-1514887672

   @mark-bathori I tested the change and I still get an error. Could you please double check it?
   My scenario:
   - start PutIceberg #1 processor connecting to unsecure HDFS/Hive
   - load data with PutIceberg #1 => success
   - start another PutIceberg #2 processor connecting to secured HDFS/Hive using Kerberos
   - load data with PutIceberg #1 => failure


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org