You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/23 08:20:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2368) Client watches are not
disconnected on close
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
ASF GitHub Bot updated ZOOKEEPER-2368:
--------------------------------------
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Client watches are not disconnected on close
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2368
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2368
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.4.0, 3.5.0
> Reporter: Timothy Ward
> Assignee: Timothy Ward
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.6.0, 3.5.5
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2368.patch
>
>
> If I have a ZooKeeper client connected to an ensemble then obviously I can register watches.
> If the client is disconnected (for example by a failing ensemble member) then I get a disconnection event for all of my watches. If, on the other hand, my client is closed then I *do not* get a disconnection event. This asymmetry makes it really hard to clear up properly when using the asynchronous API, as there is no way to "fail" data reads/updates when the client is closed.
> I believe that the correct behaviour should be for all watchers to receive a disconnection event when the client is closed. The watchers can then respond as appropriate, and can differentiate between a "server disconnect" and a "client disconnect" by checking the ZooKeeper#getState() method.
> This would not be a breaking behaviour change as Watchers are already required to handle disconnection events.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)