Re: [lang] Release Was: OSCore

[Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>]

The exception issues must be sorted before 1.0.

The builder subpackage makes it easy to exclude or include as desired. I
would prefer to see all four builders in there before the release, as this
shouldn't take long now.

Other than that, the package is ready to roll subject to release
notes/status.html etc. Whatever, we really do need to cut the release so we
can move on to reflection.

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Caswell" <st...@caswell.name>
> I've got a JDK 1.3.1/1.4 version issue to resolve with the
> NestedException stuff. I plan to look at that over the weekend. IMHO it
> should be resolved before the release.
>
>
> Steven Caswell
> steven@caswell.name
> a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
> "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 1:02 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Release Was: OSCore
> >
> >
> > There's no need to be rushing it.
> >
> > I'm a bit unsure of where we are in the release as the
> > Builders have been added, but also the NetstedException work
> > seems to have been done. [I've been focused on String
> > Taglib's impending release :) ]
> >
> > Are the builders planned for release, or will we be ignoring
> > them when the release package is built??
> >
> > Are we ready for release??
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13 Sep 2002, Daniel Rall wrote:
> >
> > > Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > I talked to Mike Cannon Brookes of Jira and Open Symphony
> > fame. He
> > > > mentioned that we might want to look in the OSCore package there:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.opensymphony.com/oscore
> > > >
> > > > and consider aggregating in any applicable works in
> > there. I took a
> > > > quick look at TextUtils and expect to roll a few methods
> > in at some
> > > > stage. Thought I'd let you all know that it's open season
> > on OSCore
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > > I was going to reimplement the TextUtils ones as they were quite
> > > > light, at least the first ones I was considering, but I think we
> > > > could probably discuss a formal submission of something
> > if there was
> > > > something complex that looked like a good fit.
> > > >
> > > > Another thing we could do is provide an API map showing which
> > > > Jakarta Commons classes could easily replace theirs. They
> > might be
> > > > interested.
> > > >
> > > > Licence wise, it's a modified Apache, so hopefully compatible.
> > >
> > > Henri, sounds good.  Does this mean we should branch?  It
> > seems like
> > > quite a bit of functionality is getting added in between beta and
> > > release candidate (though you guys are doing a great job
> > with the unit
> > > tests!).
> > > --
> > >
> > > Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail:
> > > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: [lang] Release Was: OSCore

[Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>]

"Stephen Colebourne" <sc...@btopenworld.com> writes:

> The exception issues must be sorted before 1.0.

Sounds like we're all in agreement on that one.  :)

> The builder subpackage makes it easy to exclude or include as desired. I
> would prefer to see all four builders in there before the release, as this
> shouldn't take long now.

Sounds good.

> Other than that, the package is ready to roll subject to release
> notes/status.html etc. Whatever, we really do need to cut the
> release so we can move on to reflection.

I would very much like to see at least a release candidate tagged.  We
could do that sooner, and work on release notes et al between then and
the tagging of the final.
-- 

Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>