You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/11/04 13:25:06 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32055] New: - Refactoring of SpanScorer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32055>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32055

Refactoring of SpanScorer

           Summary: Refactoring of SpanScorer
           Product: Lucene
           Version: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Search
        AssignedTo: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: paul.elschot@xs4all.nl


Refactored some common code in next() and skipTo(). 
Removed dependency on score value for next() and skipTo(). 
Passes all current tests at just about the same speed 
as the current version. Added minimal javadoc. 
 
Iirc, there has been some discussion on the dependency of next() 
and skipTo() on the score value, but I don't remember the conclusion. 
In case that dependency should stay in, it can be adapted 
in the refactored code.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org