You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr> on 2005/12/22 22:57:50 UTC
[VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
propose that we change
the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
fact that we are focusing
on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
[ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
[ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
[X] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
[ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
+1 (non-binding).
Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:10 +0100, Charles Souillard wrote:
> +1
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> > propose that we change
> > the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> > fact that we are focusing
> > on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> > [ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Charles Souillard <ch...@ext.bull.net>.
+1
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> propose that we change
> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> fact that we are focusing
> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>
> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> [ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Philip Dodds <ph...@gmail.com>.
+1 for changing to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
On 12/22/05, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr> wrote:
>
> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> propose that we change
> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> fact that we are focusing
> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>
> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> [ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Joseph Dennis Gapuz <jg...@exist.com>.
+1 for changing to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> propose that we change
> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> fact that we are focusing
> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>
> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> [ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
+1
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> propose that we change
> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> fact that we are focusing
> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>
> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
> [ ] -1 Keep 2.1 version number (provide specific comments)
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 27 Dec 2005, at 17:14, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr> wrote:
>> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
>> propose that we change
>> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
>> fact that we are focusing
>> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> +1
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!
> G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> The Castor Project
> http://www.castor.org/
>
> Apache Geronimo
> http://geronimo.apache.org/
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [VOTE] Change ServiceMix version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 12/22/05, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr> wrote:
> As we have to change the package names to org.apache.servicemix, i
> propose that we change
> the version number of ServiceMix to 3.0 to reflect this, and also the
> fact that we are focusing
> on full jbi compliance for both the container and components.
>
> [ ] +1 Change version to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/