You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Konrad Windszus (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/06/09 11:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-598) need IdConflictPolicy compatible with 3.5.0 behavior
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-598:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: test-referenceable.zip
> need IdConflictPolicy compatible with 3.5.0 behavior
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-598
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: vlt
> Affects Versions: 3.5.8
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: test-referenceable.zip
>
>
> Currently, according to the documentation (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/referenceablenodes.html), "IdConflictPolicy.FORCE_REMOVE_CONFLICTING_ID" is supposed to behave as 3.5.0 did.
> My tests show however that in 3.5.0, when importing a package with two nodes with conflicting UUIDs, both nodes were imported (and one of the UUIDs changed).
> From that point of view, CREATE_NEW_ID seems to be closer (but that one assigns new UUIDs to *both* nodes).
> Proposal: adjust CREATE_NEW_ID behavior to keep assigning a new UUID only when needed (thus preserving it for one of the nodes), and document *that* mode as compatible to 3.5.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)