You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cayenne.apache.org by Borut Bolčina <bo...@gmail.com> on 2007/09/03 14:50:32 UTC

[C3] logging

Did you consider using
http://www.slf4j.org/

-Bot

Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Bryan Lewis <br...@maine.rr.com>.
You might be amused by this blog posting:

http://arsenalist.com/2007/09/12/logging-abstraction-is-utterly-pointless/



Michael Gentry wrote:
> I thought that part was amusing.  I have no vested interest in any
> logging decision.  I was rather happy with printf() in my C code.  :-)
>  However, after seeing errors in logs in legacy code I had to maintain
> which said "An error has occurred" and no context provided, I do know
> the benefits of good logging.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
> On 9/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>   
>> Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an
>> improvement! :-)
>>
>> Andrus
>>     
>
>   


Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I thought that part was amusing.  I have no vested interest in any
logging decision.  I was rather happy with printf() in my C code.  :-)
 However, after seeing errors in logs in legacy code I had to maintain
which said "An error has occurred" and no context provided, I do know
the benefits of good logging.

/dev/mrg

On 9/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an
> improvement! :-)
>
> Andrus

Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an  
improvement! :-)

Andrus


On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:

> That's the same post Dion was picking on in the link Andrus  
> provided ;-)
>
> I don't really care all that much.  I never really found it to be a  
> problem
> when frameworks pushed log4j on me.
>
> -- 
> Kevin
>
> On 9/14/07 9:20 AM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not promoting any changes here, just adding more info:
>>
>> http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/08/so-long-commons-logging- 
>> hello-slf4j.h
>> tml
>>
>> /dev/mrg
>
>
>
>


Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
That's the same post Dion was picking on in the link Andrus provided ;-)

I don't really care all that much.  I never really found it to be a problem
when frameworks pushed log4j on me.

-- 
Kevin

On 9/14/07 9:20 AM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not promoting any changes here, just adding more info:
> 
> http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/08/so-long-commons-logging-hello-slf4j.h
> tml
> 
> /dev/mrg




Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I'm not promoting any changes here, just adding more info:

http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/08/so-long-commons-logging-hello-slf4j.html

/dev/mrg

Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I don't know, Andrus ... it says Hibernate is using it ... :-)

/dev/mrg


On 9/3/07, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> No please... not another logging framework "upgrade" :-)
>
> http://www.almaer.com/blog/archives/001563.html
>
> Andrus
>
> On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
>
> > Did you consider using
> > http://www.slf4j.org/
> >
> > -Bot
>
>

Re: [C3] logging

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
No please... not another logging framework "upgrade" :-)

http://www.almaer.com/blog/archives/001563.html

Andrus

On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote:

> Did you consider using
> http://www.slf4j.org/
>
> -Bot