You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/29 07:34:58 UTC
javax.annotation.process depends on javax.tools
Hi All,
When I looked into javax.annotation.processing package, I noticed that
this package depends on some classes of the javax.tools package.
I searched javax.tools package in java6 branch and found that we have
not implemented it yet.
Did I miss anything? If no, do we have any plan to implement this package?
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Re: javax.annotation.process depends on javax.tools
Posted by Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jimmy,
Yes, harmony has not implemented it yet, JIRA6435 has been created
for this issue.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jimmy,Jing Lv <fi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I remembered there is no such implementation for annotation
> processor in Harmony, and the implementation may not be an quick work to go.
> However I guess it may be a good topic for Google summer code :)
>
>
> 2010/1/29 Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools<http://www.kaffe.org/%7Estuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools>
>> Seems that we did miss this package.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/29 Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > When I looked into javax.annotation.processing package, I noticed that
>> > this package depends on some classes of the javax.tools package.
>> >
>> > I searched javax.tools package in java6 branch and found that we have
>> > not implemented it yet.
>> >
>> > Did I miss anything? If no, do we have any plan to implement this
>> package?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Ray Chen
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Re: javax.annotation.process depends on javax.tools
Posted by "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
As I remembered there is no such implementation for annotation
processor in Harmony, and the implementation may not be an quick work to go.
However I guess it may be a good topic for Google summer code :)
2010/1/29 Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools<http://www.kaffe.org/%7Estuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools>
> Seems that we did miss this package.
>
> Best Regards
> Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
>
>
>
> 2010/1/29 Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When I looked into javax.annotation.processing package, I noticed that
> > this package depends on some classes of the javax.tools package.
> >
> > I searched javax.tools package in java6 branch and found that we have
> > not implemented it yet.
> >
> > Did I miss anything? If no, do we have any plan to implement this
> package?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ray Chen
> >
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: javax.annotation.process depends on javax.tools
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools
Seems that we did miss this package.
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
2010/1/29 Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>
> Hi All,
>
> When I looked into javax.annotation.processing package, I noticed that
> this package depends on some classes of the javax.tools package.
>
> I searched javax.tools package in java6 branch and found that we have
> not implemented it yet.
>
> Did I miss anything? If no, do we have any plan to implement this package?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Ray Chen
>