You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/04/18 18:32:25 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] HuangLED commented on a change in pull request #11455: Fix user distribution metric test by not validating namespace.

HuangLED commented on a change in pull request #11455: Fix user distribution metric test by not validating namespace.
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11455#discussion_r410733533
 
 

 ##########
 File path: sdks/python/apache_beam/metrics/metric_test.py
 ##########
 @@ -172,10 +172,13 @@ def process(self, element):
     # Verify user distribution counter.
     metric_results = res.metrics().query()
     matcher = MetricResultMatcher(
-        namespace='apache_beam.metrics.metric_test.SomeDoFn',
+        step='ApplyPardo',
+        namespace=hc.contains_string('SomeDoFn'),
         name='element_dist',
         committed=DistributionMatcher(
-            sum_value=10, count_value=4, min_value=1, max_value=4))
+            sum_value=10, count_value=4,
 
 Review comment:
   b/c after repeating it multiple times, streaming side gives consistent outcome on these exact numbers. 
   
   After another thought though, given how much uncertainties there are on streaming side, it is really not necessary to put exact number here. And if we do really want to check exact number, there is alternative way to add that separately. 
   
   Updated by making all other threes to be 'greater_than(0)'.  PTAL. 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services