You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> on 2011/12/19 22:49:45 UTC
Time for 5.5.35?
All,
I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
(for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
coming weekend ;)
All: If we can get some more votes for the remaining issues I'll try and
spend some time applying the patches. I see there are some ready to
apply now and I'll try and get those done tomorrow.
Cheers,
Mark
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 12/20/2011 11:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>>
>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>>> coming weekend ;)
>>
>> +1 for middle of next week.
>>
>
> Fine w/ me...
if you have cycle you can do it before no?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
TC 5.5's STATUS file is clean... will wait a few hours and
unless I hear otherwise, will T&R around lunchtime.
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My plan is to T&R today...
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
My plan is to T&R today...
On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:48 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Good to see a new 5.5.x release soon :-)
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
> <kn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>> On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>>>>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>>>>>> coming weekend ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for middle of next week.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fine w/ me...
>>>
>>> The status file is clear.
>>>
>>> Bugzilla is clear (!)
>>>
>>> I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
>>> spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
>>>
>>
>> 1. There was a bug report about exception when DEBUG logging is enabled.
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
>>
>> Already fixed in 7.0 and backports proposed.
>>
>> 2. I reduced one warning to info (per BZ 52184 concerns) - also proposed.
>>
>> Neither issue is a showstopper, but should be easy to fix.
>>
>>
>> X. It might be interesting to backport UserDataHandler (BZ 52184) from
>> TC7 to earlier versions, but I am not sure how much interest is there
>> in that. It is not a showstopper, because one can configure its
>> logging to take care of BZ 52184.
>>
>> Should be easy for 6.0. Will be more work for 5.5 (replace enums with
>> int constants?). For reference, the revisions that implement this
>> feature are:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212102 (initial,
>> Cookies)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212110 (changelog)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213470 (JULI build
>> fix)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1220297
>> (catalina.policy)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224654 (API review)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224664 (Parameters)
>>
>> I expect to be rather busy next week.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Konstantin Kolinko
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com>.
Good to see a new 5.5.x release soon :-)
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
<kn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2011/12/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> > On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
> >>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
> >>>> coming weekend ;)
> >>>
> >>> +1 for middle of next week.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Fine w/ me...
> >
> > The status file is clear.
> >
> > Bugzilla is clear (!)
> >
> > I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
> > spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
> >
>
> 1. There was a bug report about exception when DEBUG logging is enabled.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
>
> Already fixed in 7.0 and backports proposed.
>
> 2. I reduced one warning to info (per BZ 52184 concerns) - also proposed.
>
> Neither issue is a showstopper, but should be easy to fix.
>
>
> X. It might be interesting to backport UserDataHandler (BZ 52184) from
> TC7 to earlier versions, but I am not sure how much interest is there
> in that. It is not a showstopper, because one can configure its
> logging to take care of BZ 52184.
>
> Should be easy for 6.0. Will be more work for 5.5 (replace enums with
> int constants?). For reference, the revisions that implement this
> feature are:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212102 (initial,
> Cookies)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212110 (changelog)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213470 (JULI build
> fix)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1220297
> (catalina.policy)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224654 (API review)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224664 (Parameters)
>
> I expect to be rather busy next week.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
--
Thanks!
Regards, Forrest
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>>>
>>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>>>> coming weekend ;)
>>>
>>> +1 for middle of next week.
>>>
>>
>> Fine w/ me...
>
> The status file is clear.
>
> Bugzilla is clear (!)
>
> I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
> spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
>
1. There was a bug report about exception when DEBUG logging is enabled.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
Already fixed in 7.0 and backports proposed.
2. I reduced one warning to info (per BZ 52184 concerns) - also proposed.
Neither issue is a showstopper, but should be easy to fix.
X. It might be interesting to backport UserDataHandler (BZ 52184) from
TC7 to earlier versions, but I am not sure how much interest is there
in that. It is not a showstopper, because one can configure its
logging to take care of BZ 52184.
Should be easy for 6.0. Will be more work for 5.5 (replace enums with
int constants?). For reference, the revisions that implement this
feature are:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212102 (initial, Cookies)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212110 (changelog)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213470 (JULI build fix)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1220297 (catalina.policy)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224654 (API review)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224664 (Parameters)
I expect to be rather busy next week.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>>
>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>>> coming weekend ;)
>>
>> +1 for middle of next week.
>>
>
> Fine w/ me...
The status file is clear.
Bugzilla is clear (!)
I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>
>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>> coming weekend ;)
>
> +1 for middle of next week.
>
Fine w/ me...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>
> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
> coming weekend ;)
+1 for middle of next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 19.12.2011 22:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>
> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
> coming weekend ;)
>
> All: If we can get some more votes for the remaining issues I'll try and
> spend some time applying the patches. I see there are some ready to
> apply now and I'll try and get those done tomorrow.
+1, I just quickly committed patch to the multi-byte char handling.
Don't have enough time right now to review your [1] :(
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org