You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@aurora.apache.org by "Bill Farner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/17 17:24:39 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1203) Make vagrant destroy/up cycles cheaper

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14365430#comment-14365430 ] 

Bill Farner commented on AURORA-1203:
-------------------------------------

Posted example at https://reviews.apache.org/r/32161/

> Make vagrant destroy/up cycles cheaper
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1203
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1203
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Story
>          Components: Testing
>            Reporter: Bill Farner
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Destroying a vagrant environment should be cheap, but we do so much during provisioning that it's quite expensive.  For example, all of the apt/dpkg-related activities are expensive and could be baked into a box that we upload to vagrantcloud.  This would make for a bigger initial download, but the image would be cached locally and reused.  I believe this would make a vagrant destroy/up cycle quite cheap.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)