You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/19 17:04:12 UTC
[jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Hi, all
I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
The report is attained through gcov
lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
to our wiki.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
--
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Posted by Jim Yu <ju...@gmail.com>.
It sounds good! I am willing to help you do this job. And we may improve the
coverage rate for our implementation.
2008/3/21, Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> Thanks, Jimmy
> And i will summarize the report for jdwp to our wiki.
>
> 2008/3/20, Jimmy,Jing Lv <fi...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/3/20, Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi, all
> > >
> > > I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
> > > The report is attained through gcov
> > > lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
> > >
> >
> > Cool!
> >
> > > The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
> > > mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
> > > If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
> > > to our wiki.
> > >
> >
> > The result looks good.
> > I'd like to help to commit, where do you want to put the result?
> > (Harmony wiki is a good place than JIRA)
> >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
> > >
> > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > Jimmy, Jing Lv
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
>
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Best Regards,
Jim Yu （虞俊杰）
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Jimmy
And i will summarize the report for jdwp to our wiki.
2008/3/20, Jimmy,Jing Lv <fi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/3/20, Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
> > The report is attained through gcov
> > lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
> >
>
> Cool!
>
> > The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
> > mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
> > If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
> > to our wiki.
> >
>
> The result looks good.
> I'd like to help to commit, where do you want to put the result?
> (Harmony wiki is a good place than JIRA)
>
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
> >
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Posted by "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2008/3/20, Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, all
>
> I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
> The report is attained through gcov
> lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
>
Cool!
> The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
> mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
> If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
> to our wiki.
>
The result looks good.
I'd like to help to commit, where do you want to put the result?
(Harmony wiki is a good place than JIRA)
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
>
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
You can open the debug info in our implementation when run the unit test.
Pass property jpda.settings.debuggeeAgentExtraOptions to vm, such as:
-Djpda.settings.debuggeeAgentExtraOptions=trace=DATA
The current implementation uses the following trace message types you can open:
CMD - JDWP commands execution
PACK - JDWP packets read/write operations
DATA - JDWP packets parsing and composing
EVENT - JDWP events tracing
MEM - memory allocation and de-allocation
MAP - object and class ID mapping
THRD - thread operations
MON - thread synchronization and monitor operations
PROG - program flow tracing
FUNC- agent functions entry/exit
JVMTI - JVMTI calls tracing
UTIL - auxiliary utility messages
LOG - arbitrary log messages
INFO - information and warning messages
ERROR - error messages
2008/3/20, Regis <xu...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, most normal code path is tested, maybe we should pay more attentions
> on error and exception cases.
>
> And i found that it's hard to test error case in native
> code using java unit test, such as read/write socket or allocate/cop
> memory .
>
> Any thoughts/suggestions about this?
>
> Sean Qiu wrote:
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
> > The report is attained through gcov
> > lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
> >
> > The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
> > mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
> > If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
> > to our wiki.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
> >
>
--
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [jdktools][jdwp][doc] JDWP coverage report
Posted by Regis <xu...@gmail.com>.
Yes, most normal code path is tested, maybe we should pay more attentions
on error and exception cases.
And i found that it's hard to test error case in native
code using java unit test, such as read/write socket or allocate/cop
memory .
Any thoughts/suggestions about this?
Sean Qiu wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I have run our unit test for jdwp to get a coverage report.
> The report is attained through gcov
> lcov is used to get a more readable html report.
>
> The good news is the report indicate that our jdwp implementation is
> mostly covered and tested.I raise a jira[1] to upload the report.
> If someone else is also interested in it, i can summarize it here or
> to our wiki.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5619
>