You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> on 2013/04/01 00:33:47 UTC
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
> >
> > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible
> > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
> > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why
> > I'd like to compare.
>
> Can you post your list? :)
Sure, why not :)
not ok 27 form_submit
not ok 36 oauth
not ok 39 purge
not ok 46 replication
not ok 47 replicator_db
not ok 49 rev_stemming
not ok 51 security_validation
not ok 62 view_conflicts
not ok 64 view_include_docs
>
>
> >
> > K
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in
> >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work
> >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in
> >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
> >>
> >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
> >> [branch]: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
> >>
> >> A+
> >> Dave
> >
> >
>
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>.
Btw., I just run the tests after I put tmp/lib onto a ramdisk, basically
the same results, except that the form_submit test now seems to pass
always (whereas without the ramdisk it only passes sometimes).
K
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 10:33 +0200, Klaus Trainer wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the logs
> > somewhere?
>
> Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi
>
> >
> >
> > On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
> > > > >
> > > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible
> > > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
> > > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why
> > > > > I'd like to compare.
> > > >
> > > > Can you post your list? :)
> > >
> > > Sure, why not :)
> > >
> > > not ok 27 form_submit
> > > not ok 36 oauth
> > > not ok 39 purge
> > > not ok 46 replication
> > > not ok 47 replicator_db
> > > not ok 49 rev_stemming
> > > not ok 51 security_validation
> > > not ok 62 view_conflicts
> > > not ok 64 view_include_docs
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > K
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > > > >> Hi everybody,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in
> > > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work
> > > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in
> > > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
> > > > >> [branch]:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
> > > > >>
> > > > >> A+
> > > > >> Dave
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
Hi Benoit,
r16 has a fix for the TZ issue anyway, and I suspect mochiweb already has
something there. If it doesn't I'll send that upstream.
On 2 April 2013 11:41, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> not totally related but why not sending the TZ patch upstream btw? Is
> there anything against that?
>
> I'm worried we have to maintain our own versions for dependencies for
> a long time instead of pushing upstream our changes I reckon that for
> a limited time we have to maintain our own set of patches (upstream
> integration can be slower or don't want the patch as is - which may be
> a big warning for us -) but in that cad I suggest that we also put the
> patch as a diff in our own repo under a `patches/` folder so it can be
> integrated differently by vendors/distributors and in that case e
> those who are using a separate mochiweb install. Also it would help us
> to synchronize our changes with upstream.
>
> - benoît
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> >> If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the
> logs
> >> somewhere?
> >
> > Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> >> > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be
> possible
> >> > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
> >> > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here.
> That's why
> >> > > > I'd like to compare.
> >> > >
> >> > > Can you post your list? :)
> >> >
> >> > Sure, why not :)
> >> >
> >> > not ok 27 form_submit
> >> > not ok 36 oauth
> >> > not ok 39 purge
> >> > not ok 46 replication
> >> > not ok 47 replicator_db
> >> > not ok 49 rev_stemming
> >> > not ok 51 security_validation
> >> > not ok 62 view_conflicts
> >> > not ok 64 view_include_docs
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > K
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> >> > > >> Hi everybody,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug
> in
> >> > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the
> work
> >> > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this
> branch in
> >> > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
> >> > > >> [branch]:
> >> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> A+
> >> > > >> Dave
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
>
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
not totally related but why not sending the TZ patch upstream btw? Is
there anything against that?
I'm worried we have to maintain our own versions for dependencies for
a long time instead of pushing upstream our changes I reckon that for
a limited time we have to maintain our own set of patches (upstream
integration can be slower or don't want the patch as is - which may be
a big warning for us -) but in that cad I suggest that we also put the
patch as a diff in our own repo under a `patches/` folder so it can be
integrated differently by vendors/distributors and in that case e
those who are using a separate mochiweb install. Also it would help us
to synchronize our changes with upstream.
- benoît
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>> If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the logs
>> somewhere?
>
> Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi
>
>>
>>
>> On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
>> > > >
>> > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible
>> > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
>> > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why
>> > > > I'd like to compare.
>> > >
>> > > Can you post your list? :)
>> >
>> > Sure, why not :)
>> >
>> > not ok 27 form_submit
>> > not ok 36 oauth
>> > not ok 39 purge
>> > not ok 46 replication
>> > not ok 47 replicator_db
>> > not ok 49 rev_stemming
>> > not ok 51 security_validation
>> > not ok 62 view_conflicts
>> > not ok 64 view_include_docs
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > K
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>> > > >> Hi everybody,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in
>> > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work
>> > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in
>> > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
>> > > >> [branch]:
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
>> > > >>
>> > > >> A+
>> > > >> Dave
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>.
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 23:26 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the logs
> somewhere?
Here you are: https://www.friendpaste.com/19YnF5A2nZHea25LEShpAi
>
>
> On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
> > > >
> > > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible
> > > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
> > > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why
> > > > I'd like to compare.
> > >
> > > Can you post your list? :)
> >
> > Sure, why not :)
> >
> > not ok 27 form_submit
> > not ok 36 oauth
> > not ok 39 purge
> > not ok 46 replication
> > not ok 47 replicator_db
> > not ok 49 rev_stemming
> > not ok 51 security_validation
> > not ok 62 view_conflicts
> > not ok 64 view_include_docs
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > K
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > > >> Hi everybody,
> > > >>
> > > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in
> > > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work
> > > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in
> > > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
> > > >>
> > > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
> > > >> [branch]:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
> > > >>
> > > >> A+
> > > >> Dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
Re: Add OTP R16B support + upgrade Mochiweb to 2.4.2
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
If you run those by hand with an extra `-v` option, can you share the logs
somewhere?
On 1 April 2013 00:33, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 22:46 +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 2013, at 22:43 , Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dave, what tests do you have exactly failing?
> > >
> > > I got nine (consistently) failing tests. However, it might be possible
> > > that a few of them are timeout related, as I'm still working with
> > > spinning discs (do you remember those?) on my computer here. That's why
> > > I'd like to compare.
> >
> > Can you post your list? :)
>
> Sure, why not :)
>
> not ok 27 form_submit
> not ok 36 oauth
> not ok 39 purge
> not ok 46 replication
> not ok 47 replicator_db
> not ok 49 rev_stemming
> not ok 51 security_validation
> not ok 62 view_conflicts
> not ok 64 view_include_docs
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > K
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 15:29 +0200, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > >> Hi everybody,
> > >>
> > >> I have a couple more tests to make on ensuring the timezone bug in
> > >> earlier OTP releases is correctly resolved, but the bulk of the work
> > >> is done. Unless somebody reports an issue, I'll include this branch in
> > >> master in the next week, probably cherry-picked.
> > >>
> > >> [jira]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1696
> > >> [branch]:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2;hb=1696-update-mochiweb-2-4-2
> > >>
> > >> A+
> > >> Dave
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>