You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> on 2005/05/03 01:34:54 UTC
Nightly build
We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
Sean ? :)
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Nightly builds (and release builds) have now been fixed to use SVN. I
will double check later tonight to make sure the build is performed as
scheduled.
sean
On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > implementation.
>
> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> > I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> >>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> >>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> >>> of the core or optional tasks.
> >>
> >> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> >>
> >> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> >>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> >>>> the build script.
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >>>> javadoc.
> >>>>
> >>>> sean
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Gotcha.
On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I was responding to Manfred. I think i came in on the middel
> of a conversation without knowing the context ;-) my bad :D.
>
> "Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> single file regardless if it was really changed or not."
>
> I was simply saying that the change is maintained on the commit. It is
> not maintained based on the number of files that have changed. So, if
> you changed 20 files, deleted 10 and replaced 4 the overall version
> number would only increment by 1 if you perform it in 1 commit.
>
> Brandon
>
> On 5/13/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Brandon,
> >
> > I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
> > and over again? If so, I agree with you. My plan was to do a regular
> > delete and then commit. TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
> > does not. So I am stuck.
> >
> > Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
> > Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
> > Ant if possible.
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> > > subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> > > repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> > > repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> > > changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> > > the SVN manual. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> > >
> > > Brandon
> > >
> > > On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > > > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > > > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > > > files in the repository.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > Manfred,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > > > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > > > replaced?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> > > > > quick
> > > > > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > > > files
> > > > > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > > > something
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > > > svn
> > > > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> > > > > check
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > > > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > > > plus
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > > > try
> > > > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > > > dir
> > > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > > > tldoc
> > > > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > > > build
> > > > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, I was responding to Manfred. I think i came in on the middel
of a conversation without knowing the context ;-) my bad :D.
"Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
single file regardless if it was really changed or not."
I was simply saying that the change is maintained on the commit. It is
not maintained based on the number of files that have changed. So, if
you changed 20 files, deleted 10 and replaced 4 the overall version
number would only increment by 1 if you perform it in 1 commit.
Brandon
On 5/13/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Brandon,
>
> I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
> and over again? If so, I agree with you. My plan was to do a regular
> delete and then commit. TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
> does not. So I am stuck.
>
> Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
> Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
> Ant if possible.
>
> sean
>
>
> On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> > subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> > repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> > repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> > changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> > the SVN manual. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> >
> > Brandon
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > > files in the repository.
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Manfred,
> > > > >
> > > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno,
> > > > >
> > > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > > replaced?
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> > > > quick
> > > > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > > files
> > > > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > > something
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > > svn
> > > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> > > > check
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > > not
> > > > > > part
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > > the
> > > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then
> > > > I
> > > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > > plus
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > > try
> > > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > > dir
> > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > > tldoc
> > > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > > the
> > > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > > to
> > > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > > build
> > > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Brandon,
I take it you are saying you should not svn delete and svn add over
and over again? If so, I agree with you. My plan was to do a regular
delete and then commit. TortoiseSVN seems to allow this bug svnant
does not. So I am stuck.
Anyone have a suggestion on how I can do this easily in Ant?
Obviously one could write scripts, etc. but I'm looking to do it in
Ant if possible.
sean
On 5/13/05, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
> subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
> repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
> repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
> changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
> the SVN manual. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
>
> Brandon
>
> On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> > Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> > single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> > > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > > files in the repository.
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Manfred,
> > > >
> > > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > > comparable commands for those.)
> > > >
> > > > Bruno,
> > > >
> > > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > > replaced?
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > > >
> > > > > Bruno
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > > -Manfred
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> > > quick
> > > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > > files
> > > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> > > so
> > > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> > > something
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > > svn
> > > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > > recall
> > > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> > > check
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > > not
> > > > > part
> > > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > > > > infra
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > > the
> > > > > firewall
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then
> > > I
> > > > > will fix
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > > plus
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > > try
> > > > > to upload
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > > dir
> > > > > last
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > > tldoc
> > > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > > the
> > > > > future.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > > to
> > > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > > build
> > > > > script to send
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I am just beginning with svn, but what I found is if you svn delete a file
and add again the same file, svn thinks that this is a replacement and does
not compare both files. I think this is the price you must pay if you delete
all the files first... if there was a way to svn delete only the old files,
maybe you could do that comparing versions after commit, but I don't know if
this is easy to achieve...
Bruno
2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
> Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final
> commit?
> Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and
> then
> > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status
> of
> > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files
> are
> > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the
> regenerated
> > files in the repository.
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > Manfred,
> > >
> > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > comparable commands for those.)
> > >
> > > Bruno,
> > >
> > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > replaced?
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn
> delete
> > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on
> commit...
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target
> that
> > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > -Manfred
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting
> the
> > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over
> again.
> > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on
> the
> > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> > quick
> > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > files
> > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website
> and
> > so
> > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and
> update. It
> > > > should
> > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary
> version
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > (including
> > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> > something
> > > > on
> > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete
> java
> > svn
> > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I
> don't
> > > > recall
> > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > from
> > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more
> tests.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> > check
> > > > into
> > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN
> with
> > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since
> its
> > not
> > > > part
> > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build.
> The
> > > > infra
> > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to
> open
> > the
> > > > firewall
> > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP.
> Then
> > I
> > > > will fix
> > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website
> build
> > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating
> that
> > plus
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated
> automatically.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not
> been
> > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken.
> Will
> > try
> > > > to upload
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the
> website
> > dir
> > > > last
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > tldoc
> > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again
> in
> > the
> > > > future.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and
> upload
> > to
> > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > build
> > > > script to send
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
This is how SVN functions. It strongly recommends against trying to
subvert this functionality. SVN works on the idea that 1 change to the
repository is a change to the whole repository. You CAN diff your
repository and see changes on various levels. So, you can see what has
changed and get a report the same as CVS. I'd recommend that you read
the SVN manual. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
Brandon
On 5/13/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
> Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
> single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> > Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> > regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> > the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> > 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> > marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> > files in the repository.
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > Manfred,
> > >
> > > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > > comparable commands for those.)
> > >
> > > Bruno,
> > >
> > > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > > replaced?
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > > -Manfred
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> > quick
> > > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> > files
> > > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> > so
> > > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > > should
> > > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > > (including
> > > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> > something
> > > > on
> > > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> > svn
> > > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > > recall
> > > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> > 0.9.13.zip"
> > > > from
> > > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> > check
> > > > into
> > > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > > Ant?
> > > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> > not
> > > > part
> > > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > > > infra
> > > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> > the
> > > > firewall
> > > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then
> > I
> > > > will fix
> > > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > > procedure.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> > plus
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> > build-site.xml
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > > synced yet.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> > try
> > > > to upload
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> > dir
> > > > last
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> > tldoc
> > > > and javadoc
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> > the
> > > > future.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> > to
> > > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> > build
> > > > script to send
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Does svn make a diff and some kind of optimization during the final commit?
Otherwise we would always have a new repository version for every
single file regardless if it was really changed or not.
-Manfred
2005/5/13, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
> regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
> the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
> 'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
> marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
> files in the repository.
>
> Bruno
>
>
> 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > Manfred,
> >
> > I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> > think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> > comparable commands for those.)
> >
> > Bruno,
> >
> > The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> > files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> > longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> > saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> > them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> > replaced?
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > > empties the site build dir.
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> quick
> > > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> files
> > > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> so
> > > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > > should
> > > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > > (including
> > > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> something
> > > on
> > > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> svn
> > > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > > recall
> > > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> 0.9.13.zip"
> > > from
> > > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> check
> > > into
> > > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > > Ant?
> > > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> not
> > > part
> > > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > > infra
> > > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> the
> > > firewall
> > > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then
> I
> > > will fix
> > > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > > procedure.
> > > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> plus
> > > the
> > > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> build-site.xml
> > > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > > synced yet.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> try
> > > to upload
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> dir
> > > last
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> tldoc
> > > and javadoc
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> the
> > > future.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> to
> > > the nightly build?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith < grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> build
> > > script to send
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Yes, Sean, this is how it should be. You first svn delete all HTMLs and then
regenerate them and svn add the new files. If you then check the status of
the svn, it will tell you that all regenerated files are 'replaced' or
'added', depending if they existed before, and the not regenerated files are
marked with 'delete'. After the commit, you will have only the regenerated
files in the repository.
Bruno
2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> Manfred,
>
> I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
> think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
> comparable commands for those.)
>
> Bruno,
>
> The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
> files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
> longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
> saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
> them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
> replaced?
>
> sean
>
> On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> > command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > > empties the site build dir.
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Martin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One
> quick
> > > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete"
> files
> > > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and
> so
> > > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> > should
> > > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > >
> > > > > > sean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version
> of
> > the
> > > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> > (including
> > > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading
> something
> > on
> > > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java
> svn
> > > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> > recall
> > > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant
> 0.9.13.zip"
> > from
> > > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> sean
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to
> check
> > into
> > > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> > Ant?
> > > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its
> not
> > part
> > > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> --
> > > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> > infra
> > > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open
> the
> > firewall
> > > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I
> > will fix
> > > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> > procedure.
> > > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that
> plus
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to
> build-site.xml
> > > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> > synced yet.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will
> try
> > to upload
> > > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website
> dir
> > last
> > > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add
> tldoc
> > and javadoc
> > > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in
> the
> > future.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload
> to
> > the nightly build?
> > > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly
> build
> > script to send
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Manfred,
I too seem to recall that forrest has a clean command but I don't
think that will help with the javadoc and tlddoc (unless there are
comparable commands for those.)
Bruno,
The delete command would be fine but we don't know in advance which
files are to be deleted. Ex. We remove a class file and so we no
longer want the corresponding HTML file in the javadoc. Are you
saying that deleting the files with svn delete and then regenerating
them will only result in an svn delete for the files that were not
replaced?
sean
On 5/13/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
> command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> > empties the site build dir.
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com >:
> > > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Martin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
> > > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > > >
> > > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> should
> > > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of
> the
> > > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> (including
> > > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something
> on
> > > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > > > >>> implementation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> recall
> > > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip"
> from
> > > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check
> into
> > > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with
> Ant?
> > > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not
> part
> > > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> infra
> > > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the
> firewall
> > > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I
> will fix
> > > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> procedure.
> > > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus
> the
> > > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> sean
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> synced yet.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler < manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try
> to upload
> > > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir
> last
> > > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc
> and javadoc
> > > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the
> future.
> > > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to
> the nightly build?
> > > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${ project.dir}/../site
> > > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build
> script to send
> > > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I think you should first mark the files as 'deleted' with the svn delete
command, then, these files will be deleted automatically on commit...
Bruno
2005/5/13, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
> If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
> empties the site build dir.
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> > I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> > defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> > website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> > I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> > commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > > > Martin,
> > > >
> > > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
> > > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> > >
> > > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It
> should
> > > "just work", though. ;-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of
> the
> > > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues
> (including
> > > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > > >>> implementation.
> > > >>
> > > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't
> recall
> > > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip"
> from
> > > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Martin Cooper
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> sean
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check
> into
> > > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not
> part
> > > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> sean
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The
> infra
> > > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the
> firewall
> > > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will
> fix
> > > >>>>>> the build script.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build
> procedure.
> > > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus
> the
> > > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> sean
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been
> synced yet.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try
> to upload
> > > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir
> last
> > > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc
> and javadoc
> > > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the
> future.
> > > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to
> the nightly build?
> > > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build
> script to send
> > > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
If I remember right, there is already a forrest "clean" target that
empties the site build dir.
-Manfred
2005/5/13, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
> defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
> website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
> I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
> commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
>
> sean
>
> On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
> > > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
> > > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
> >
> > No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
> > "just work", though. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > >>> implementation.
> > >>
> > >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> > >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> > >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Martin Cooper
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> > >>>
> > >>> sean
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> > >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> > >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Martin Cooper
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> sean
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> > >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> > >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> > >>>>>> the build script.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> > >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> > >>>>>> javadoc.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> sean
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> > >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> > >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> > >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> > >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I double-checked and realized that Forrest was *not* deleting the
defunct files. So next I will try having ant remove all of the
website files (*.html, etc.) and then generate them all over again.
I'll then see if the defunct files are automatically removed on the
commit. Regular commit is working fine so I have high hopes :-)
sean
On 5/12/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Martin,
> >
> > Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
> > question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> > that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
> > files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
>
> No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
> "just work", though. ;-)
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
> >>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> >>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> >>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> >>> implementation.
> >>
> >> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> >> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> >> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> >>>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> >>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> >>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> >>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
> >>>>
> >>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Martin Cooper
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> sean
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> >>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> >>>>>> the build script.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >>>>>> javadoc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> sean
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
> question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
> that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
> files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
No, I haven't tried delete. I've only used checkout and update. It should
"just work", though. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
>>> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
>>> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
>>> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
>>> implementation.
>>
>> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
>> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
>> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
>>
>> --
>> Martin Cooper
>>
>>
>>> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
>>>
>>> sean
>>>
>>> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
>>>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
>>>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
>>>>> of the core or optional tasks.
>>>>
>>>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
>>>>
>>>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Cooper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> sean
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
>>>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
>>>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
>>>>>> the build script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
>>>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
>>>>>> javadoc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
>>>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
>>>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
>>>>>>>> them again ASAP.
>>>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
>>>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
>>>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
>>>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
>>>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
>>>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
>>>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
>>>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
>>>>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
>>>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
>>>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
Never mind. I got it working so I don't need the distro. One quick
question though. Have you ever used ant and svn to "delete" files
that were already checked in. We're rebuilding our website and so
files need to be removed if the javadoc changes etc.
sean
On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
> > jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> > lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> > the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> > implementation.
>
> The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
> where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
> somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> > I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> >>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> >>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> >>> of the core or optional tasks.
> >>
> >> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
> >>
> >> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> >>
> >> --
> >> Martin Cooper
> >>
> >>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> >>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> >>>> the build script.
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >>>> javadoc.
> >>>>
> >>>> sean
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>>>> -Manfred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
> jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
> lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
> the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
> implementation.
The distro I picked up has a svnjavahl.dll in it, yes. I don't recall
where I got the binaries from, but I picked up "svnant 0.9.13.zip" from
somewhere. I can send it to you off-list if you want.
--
Martin Cooper
> I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
>
> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
>>> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
>>> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
>>> of the core or optional tasks.
>>
>> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
>>
>> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
>>
>> --
>> Martin Cooper
>>
>>
>>> sean
>>>
>>> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
>>>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
>>>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
>>>> the build script.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
>>>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
>>>> javadoc.
>>>>
>>>> sean
>>>>
>>>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
>>>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
>>>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>
>>>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
>>>>>> them again ASAP.
>>>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
>>>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
>>>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
>>>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
>>>>>> The following steps would be great:
>>>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
>>>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
>>>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
>>>>>> -Manfred
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
>>>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
>>>>>>> Sean ? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Are you using javahl as well? I couldn't get a binary version of the
jar and the build file from the source had several issues (including
lacking a jar command.) I moved to jsvn after reading something on
the subversion site about jsvn being the most complete java svn
implementation.
I think I have it working now but I'm doing a few more tests.
sean
On 5/3/05, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> > SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> > of the core or optional tasks.
>
> I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
>
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> >> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> >> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> >> the build script.
> >>
> >> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> >> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> >> javadoc.
> >>
> >> sean
> >>
> >> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> >>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> >>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >>>
> >>> -Manfred
> >>>
> >>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> >>>> them again ASAP.
> >>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> >>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> >>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> >>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> >>>> The following steps would be great:
> >>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> >>>> * SVN commit it automatically
> >>>> * sftp it to minotaur
> >>>> -Manfred
> >>>>
> >>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> >>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> >>>>> Sean ? :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> of the core or optional tasks.
I use SvnAnt, which works just fine.
http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
--
Martin Cooper
> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
>> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
>> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
>> the build script.
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
>> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
>> javadoc.
>>
>> sean
>>
>> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
>>> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
>>> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>>>
>>> -Manfred
>>>
>>> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
>>>> them again ASAP.
>>>> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
>>>> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
>>>> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
>>>> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
>>>> The following steps would be great:
>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
>>>> -Manfred
>>>>
>>>> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
>>>>> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
>>>>> Sean ? :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
Looks like :
http://svn.collab.net/repos/subclipse/trunk/svnant/doc/svn.html
Will do it..
Sean Schofield wrote:
>OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
>SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
>Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
>of the core or optional tasks.
>
>sean
>
>On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
>>people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
>>for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
>>the build script.
>>
>>I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
>>I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
>>javadoc.
>>
>>sean
>>
>>On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
>>>so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
>>>did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>>>
>>>-Manfred
>>>
>>>2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
>>>>them again ASAP.
>>>>I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
>>>>time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
>>>>to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
>>>>Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
>>>>The following steps would be great:
>>>> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
>>>> * SVN commit it automatically
>>>> * sftp it to minotaur
>>>>-Manfred
>>>>
>>>>2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
>>>>>everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
>>>>>Sean ? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>.
>
>
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
Thanks. I've been looking at that one but running into some issues.
I just discovered another option called jsvn. It seems to be working
great so far but there is literally zero documentation.
sean
On 5/3/05, John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Sean,
>
> Take a look at svnant.
>
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
>
> Kind Regards,
> John Fallows.
>
> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> > SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> > Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> > of the core or optional tasks.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> > > people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> > > for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> > > the build script.
> > >
> > > I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> > > I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> > > javadoc.
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > > so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > > did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> > > >
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > > > > them again ASAP.
> > > > > I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > > > > time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > > > > to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > > > > Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > > > > The following steps would be great:
> > > > > * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > > > > * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > > * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > > -Manfred
> > > > >
> > > > > 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > > > > > everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > > Sean ? :)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by John Fallows <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hey Sean,
Take a look at svnant.
http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
Kind Regards,
John Fallows.
On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
> SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
> Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
> of the core or optional tasks.
>
> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> > people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> > for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> > the build script.
> >
> > I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> > I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> > javadoc.
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > > so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > > did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> > >
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > > tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > > > them again ASAP.
> > > > I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > > > time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > > > to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > > > Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > > > The following steps would be great:
> > > > * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > > > * SVN commit it automatically
> > > > * sftp it to minotaur
> > > > -Manfred
> > > >
> > > > 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > > > > everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > > Sean ? :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
OK. I have SVN working at my office now. Next step is to check into
SVN and Ant. Anyone have any experience with using SVN with Ant?
Looks like I need to hunt around for a custom task since its not part
of the core or optional tasks.
sean
On 5/3/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
> people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
> for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
> the build script.
>
> I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
> I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
> javadoc.
>
> sean
>
> On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> > so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> > did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
> >
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > > tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > > them again ASAP.
> > > I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > > time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > > to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > > Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > > The following steps would be great:
> > > * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > > * SVN commit it automatically
> > > * sftp it to minotaur
> > > -Manfred
> > >
> > > 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > > >
> > > > We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > > > everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > > Sean ? :)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
First I will try to get SVN working for nightly build. The infra
people at my work have still not figured out how to open the firewall
for SVN (Grrrrr.) I need to get that resolved ASAP. Then I will fix
the build script.
I haven't had a chance to look at Manfred's website build procedure.
I will investigate that next and look into automating that plus the
javadoc.
sean
On 5/3/05, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
> so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
> did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
>
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> > them again ASAP.
> > I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> > time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> > to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> > Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> > The following steps would be great:
> > * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> > * SVN commit it automatically
> > * sftp it to minotaur
> > -Manfred
> >
> > 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > >
> > > We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > > everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > > Sean ? :)
> > >
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
ok, I added the javadoc and tlddoc creation to build-site.xml
so, on site creation those dirs are updated automatically.
did also a "svn up" on minotaur, but mirrors have not been synced yet.
-Manfred
2005/5/3, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
> them again ASAP.
> I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
> time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
> to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
> Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
> The following steps would be great:
> * automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
> * SVN commit it automatically
> * sftp it to minotaur
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >
> > We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> > everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> > Sean ? :)
> >
>
Re: Nightly build
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
tldoc and javadoc on homepage are currently broken. Will try to upload
them again ASAP.
I think it was my fault, because I cleaned up the website dir last
time before I checked it out from SVN. So I will add tldoc and javadoc
to the site in SVN, so that this cannot happen again in the future.
Sean, is it possible to add the doc creation and upload to the nightly build?
The following steps would be great:
* automatically build docs in ${project.dir}/../site
* SVN commit it automatically
* sftp it to minotaur
-Manfred
2005/5/3, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>
> We probably now need to urgently update the nightly build script to send
> everything to Subversion instead of CVS.
> Sean ? :)
>