You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by AndyG <an...@orprovision.com> on 2012/01/10 13:53:30 UTC
Website OpenEJB link
The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Can we get EJB Lite integrated too or doesn't that makes sense? I like
the figures on this page [1]. Namely: Table 1, Figure 1 and Table 2.
Matthias Weßendorf did something similar at [2].
[1]: http://jaxenter.com/introducing-the-java-ee-web-profile-36201.html
[2]: http://it-republik.de/jaxenter/artikel/Java-EE-6-Web-Profile-3530.html
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well.
>
> I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB.
>
> There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could give some insight into how we got to where we are (an "EJB" project with an EE implementation).
>
> http://openejb.apache.org/evolution-of-ejb.html
>
> Probably there's more that can be done there.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:25 AM, stratwine wrote:
>
>> Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table
>> should be good then !
>>
>> -Vishwa
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html
>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
I found these EJB 3.1 versus EJB 3.1 Lite comparison Tables:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/1321142/Part-Three-New-Features-in-EJB-31
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58406396/91/EJB-Lite
http://books.google.de/books?id=8pQbMr5X-yMC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=ejb+lite+comparison&source=bl&ots=cBACMGm1DR&sig=L_dRM2onWjcSRiWEcHZDzvI2sSk&hl=de&sa=X&ei=-e8UT_3gMIHNswbthN1F&ved=0CFkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=ejb%20lite%20comparison&f=false
http://www.developer.com/img/2010/05/EJBLite_EJB-Full.JPG
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well.
>
> I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB.
>
> There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could give some insight into how we got to where we are (an "EJB" project with an EE implementation).
>
> http://openejb.apache.org/evolution-of-ejb.html
>
> Probably there's more that can be done there.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:25 AM, stratwine wrote:
>
>> Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table
>> should be good then !
>>
>> -Vishwa
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html
>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well.
I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB.
There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could give some insight into how we got to where we are (an "EJB" project with an EE implementation).
http://openejb.apache.org/evolution-of-ejb.html
Probably there's more that can be done there.
-David
On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:25 AM, stratwine wrote:
> Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table
> should be good then !
>
> -Vishwa
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by stratwine <to...@gmail.com>.
Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table
should be good then !
-Vishwa
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
IMHO thr table is clear enough.
The pyramid means you need to understand how to read it, that's less
obvious i think.
- Romain
Le 14 janv. 2012 13:38, "dsh" <da...@googlemail.com> a écrit :
> I like the idea, although I had to concentrate to not get confused by
> the pyramid analogy which may look like OpenEJB as the foundation for
> everything is more feature-rich than TomEE+ on the top.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:33 PM, stratwine <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe we could include a pyramid-image to show what is a superset of
> what..?
> > Something like this http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21185523/comparison.html ?
> >
> > Vishwa
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4294687.html
> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
I like the idea, although I had to concentrate to not get confused by
the pyramid analogy which may look like OpenEJB as the foundation for
everything is more feature-rich than TomEE+ on the top.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:33 PM, stratwine <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe we could include a pyramid-image to show what is a superset of what..?
> Something like this http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21185523/comparison.html ?
>
> Vishwa
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4294687.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by stratwine <to...@gmail.com>.
Maybe we could include a pyramid-image to show what is a superset of what..?
Something like this http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21185523/comparison.html ?
Vishwa
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4294687.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Looks good. Can you center the alignment of the Tomcat, OpenEJB and
TomEE+ column? What about TomEE? Do we want to compare TomEE against
TomEE+?
Would the look & feel be nicer if the title row of the table would
have a light grey background?
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>
> [...]
>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>
> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>
> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
I put the complete set of figures online at p.a.o.
-> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/figures/
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:07 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for the article I did this figure to illustrate which project is
> providing an implementation for which AIP.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR page.
>>
>> The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a different page dedicated to the projects themselves.
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote:
>>
>>> Btw, I intended the following navigation structure:
>>>
>>> 1) root
>>> 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html
>>> 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html
>>> 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html
>>> 2) comparison
>>> 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html
>>> 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html
>>> 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html
>>
>> Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the apache-tomee.html and documentation.html.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
>>>> to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
>>>>
>>>> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
>>>>
>>>> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
>>>> that comes from.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>>>>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>>>>>
>>>>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>>>>>
>>>>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
for the article I did this figure to illustrate which project is
providing an implementation for which AIP.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR page.
>
> The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a different page dedicated to the projects themselves.
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote:
>
>> Btw, I intended the following navigation structure:
>>
>> 1) root
>> 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html
>> 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html
>> 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html
>> 2) comparison
>> 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html
>> 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html
>> 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html
>
> Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the apache-tomee.html and documentation.html.
>
>
> -David
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
>>> to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
>>>
>>> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
>>>
>>> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
>>> that comes from.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>>>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>>>>
>>>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>>>>
>>>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Sounds good. The main intention was to have both the JSR and project
links available. Doesn't matter much whether they are on the same or
on separate pages.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR page.
>
> The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a different page dedicated to the projects themselves.
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote:
>
>> Btw, I intended the following navigation structure:
>>
>> 1) root
>> 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html
>> 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html
>> 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html
>> 2) comparison
>> 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html
>> 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html
>> 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html
>
> Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the apache-tomee.html and documentation.html.
>
>
> -David
>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
>>> to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
>>>
>>> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
>>>
>>> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
>>> that comes from.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>>>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>>>>
>>>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>>>>
>>>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
I like the JSR links, that's excellent. We can probably do that without the JSR numbers and instead just like "JavaServer Faces" etc. right to the JSR page.
The who implements what detail is maybe a bit distracting on that page and perhaps better left on a different page. Seeing so many project names on that page seems to take the focus off us. We could probably have a different page dedicated to the projects themselves.
On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:02 PM, dsh wrote:
> Btw, I intended the following navigation structure:
>
> 1) root
> 1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html
> 1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html
> 1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html
> 2) comparison
> 2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html
> 2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html
> 2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html
Maybe instead of that we can include links to the comparison on the apache-tomee.html and documentation.html.
-David
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
>> to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
>>
>> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
>>
>> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
>> that comes from.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>>>
>>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>>>
>>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Btw, I intended the following navigation structure:
1) root
1.1) root: TomEE >> comparison.html
1.2) root: TomEE+ >> comparison.html
1.3) root: OpenEJB >> comparison.html
2) comparison
2.1) comparison: TomEE >> apache-tomee.html
2.2) comparison: TomEE+ >> apache-tomee.html
2.3) comparison: OpenEJB >> documentation.html
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:53 PM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
> to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
>
> -> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
>
> PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
> that comes from.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>>
>> [...]
>>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>>
>> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>>
>> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -David
>>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Did a few table tweaks - I thought it would be helpful to have links
to JSRs and the project implementing it available.
-> http://people.apache.org/~dsh/oejbsite/comparison/comparison.html
PS: align="absmiddle" doesn't seem to be valid HTML. Not sure where
that comes from.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>>> in the comparison matrix).
>>
> [...]
>> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
>
> Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
>
> http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
>
>> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
>> in the comparison matrix).
>
[...]
> So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
Went ahead and did that. If people like it, I'll hook it up to the OpenEJB button
http://openejb.staging.apache.org/comparison.html
Thoughts?
-David
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:
> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
> in the comparison matrix).
Did a quick look at the Google Analytics. Some stats from the last 30 days:
Between the three main "product" links, here's where traffic goes:
28% - OpenEJB button
21% - TomEE button
11% - TomEE+ button
So I think we should definitely keep it and having it include some OpenEJB content would be wise. A comparison that includes all three would seem like a great way to educate people that all three are effectively variations of the same thing.
Looking further at the analytics what seems to be bringing people to our site is split nearly 50/50 between "OpenEJB" and "TomEE"
Looking at the top four searched keywords:
883 - openejb
876 - tomee
387 - apache tomee
138 - open ejb
Some incredibly impressive catch-up considering the three short months that TomEE's actually been released, just barely edging out OpenEJB if you add up all the "TomEE" variants.
However the two are nearly equally dominant. At least for the moment :)
So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE specs they implement?
-David
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1, great idea Daniel !
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>>
>> 2012/1/10 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>>
>>> Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
>>> differences between:
>>>
>>> * Apache OpenEJB
>>> * Apache TomEE
>>> * Apache TomEE+
>>>
>>> and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
>>> contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
>>>> Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
>>>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
+1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
in the comparison matrix).
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, great idea Daniel !
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> 2012/1/10 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>
>> Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
>> differences between:
>>
>> * Apache OpenEJB
>> * Apache TomEE
>> * Apache TomEE+
>>
>> and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
>> contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
>> > Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
>> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
+1, great idea Daniel !
Jean-Louis
2012/1/10 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
> differences between:
>
> * Apache OpenEJB
> * Apache TomEE
> * Apache TomEE+
>
> and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
> contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>
> wrote:
> > The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
> > Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com>.
I think its a good idea. Although, I would prefer to compare TomEE and
TomEE+ and not even mention OpenEJB on the page.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
> differences between:
>
> * Apache OpenEJB
> * Apache TomEE
> * Apache TomEE+
>
> and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
> contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <an...@orprovision.com> wrote:
>> The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
>> Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Karan Singh Malhi
twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
Re: Website OpenEJB link
Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
differences between:
* Apache OpenEJB
* Apache TomEE
* Apache TomEE+
and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <an...@orprovision.com> wrote:
> The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
> Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.