You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Stanczak Group <ju...@stanczakgroup.com> on 2007/03/06 05:48:59 UTC
MINA vs.?
Just wondering, but what are the head-to-head, so to speak, equals to
MINA? Like I was thinking MINA vs. JBoss Remoting, but they're not the
same, correct?
--
Justin Stanczak
Stanczak Group
812-735-3600
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
Re: MINA vs.?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
What ever happened to Coconut over at Codehaus? I guess it's dead.
I don't think there is anything out there that is as coherent, performant
and
easy to use as MINA.
Alex
On 3/6/07, Mark Webb <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The only thing that comes to mind is ACE. There is a java version of ACE
> (
> http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu/JACE/), but I know nothing about it.
>
>
> On 3/6/07, Harold Combs <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Justin,
> >
> > I know of no OpenSource implementation, but one (rather old) idea that
> > seems
> > similar to MINA is the Conduits+ framework:
> >
> > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/23071.html
> > http://www.glue.ch/~hueni/conduits/
> >
> > The similarity, to me, is a well-defined black box (favoring composition
> > and
> > configuration) framework, that's plastic enough to implement any
> protocol.
> >
> > However, since there's no reference implementation, imagine doing MINA
> > with
> > no examples, and no API docs aside from the 'At a Glance' diagram found
> in
> > the powerpoints!
> >
> > -Harold
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/5/07, Stanczak Group <ju...@stanczakgroup.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just wondering, but what are the head-to-head, so to speak, equals to
> > > MINA? Like I was thinking MINA vs. JBoss Remoting, but they're not the
> > > same, correct?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Justin Stanczak
> > > Stanczak Group
> > > 812-735-3600
> > >
> > > "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
> > > nothing."
> > > Edmund Burke
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ..Cheers
> Mark
>
Re: MINA vs.?
Posted by Mark Webb <el...@gmail.com>.
The only thing that comes to mind is ACE. There is a java version of ACE (
http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu/JACE/), but I know nothing about it.
On 3/6/07, Harold Combs <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Justin,
>
> I know of no OpenSource implementation, but one (rather old) idea that
> seems
> similar to MINA is the Conduits+ framework:
>
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/23071.html
> http://www.glue.ch/~hueni/conduits/
>
> The similarity, to me, is a well-defined black box (favoring composition
> and
> configuration) framework, that's plastic enough to implement any protocol.
>
> However, since there's no reference implementation, imagine doing MINA
> with
> no examples, and no API docs aside from the 'At a Glance' diagram found in
> the powerpoints!
>
> -Harold
>
>
>
> On 3/5/07, Stanczak Group <ju...@stanczakgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering, but what are the head-to-head, so to speak, equals to
> > MINA? Like I was thinking MINA vs. JBoss Remoting, but they're not the
> > same, correct?
> >
> > --
> > Justin Stanczak
> > Stanczak Group
> > 812-735-3600
> >
> > "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
> > nothing."
> > Edmund Burke
> >
> >
>
--
..Cheers
Mark
Re: MINA vs.?
Posted by Harold Combs <mi...@gmail.com>.
Justin,
I know of no OpenSource implementation, but one (rather old) idea that seems
similar to MINA is the Conduits+ framework:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/23071.html
http://www.glue.ch/~hueni/conduits/
The similarity, to me, is a well-defined black box (favoring composition and
configuration) framework, that's plastic enough to implement any protocol.
However, since there's no reference implementation, imagine doing MINA with
no examples, and no API docs aside from the 'At a Glance' diagram found in
the powerpoints!
-Harold
On 3/5/07, Stanczak Group <ju...@stanczakgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Just wondering, but what are the head-to-head, so to speak, equals to
> MINA? Like I was thinking MINA vs. JBoss Remoting, but they're not the
> same, correct?
>
> --
> Justin Stanczak
> Stanczak Group
> 812-735-3600
>
> "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
> nothing."
> Edmund Burke
>
>