You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oltu.apache.org by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com> on 2012/12/07 11:40:47 UTC
podling name search
Hi *,
some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
So we might need to change the final name... :S
WDYT?
Regards
Antonio
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
Re: podling name search
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
and also they seemed to have copied our logo (making it better :P)...too
bad.
Tommaso
2012/12/7 Pid * <pi...@pidster.com>
> +1 Yup I think so too.
>
>
> On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:30, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a
> > completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber.
> >
> > +1 for a new name.
> > Tommaso
> >
> > 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
> >
> >>
> >> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>
> >>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly
> when
> >>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
> >>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking
> about
> >>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
> >>
> >> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search
> >>
> >> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >>
> >>> What do others think?
> >>> Tommaso
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi *,
> >>>>
> >>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to
> double
> >>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
> >>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
> >>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Antonio
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
> >>
> >>
>
Re: podling name search
Posted by Pid * <pi...@pidster.com>.
+1 Yup I think so too.
On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:30, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a
> completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber.
>
> +1 for a new name.
> Tommaso
>
> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
>>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
>>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
>>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
>>
>> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search
>>
>> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>>> What do others think?
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi *,
>>>>
>>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>>>>
>>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>>
>>
Re: podling name search
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a
completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber.
+1 for a new name.
Tommaso
2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>
> > thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
> > the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
> > other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
> > OSS so it may be the case :-(
>
> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
>
> > What do others think?
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
> >
> >> Hi *,
> >>
> >> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
> >> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
> >>
> >> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
> >> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
> >> So we might need to change the final name... :S
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >>
> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>
>
Re: podling name search
Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
> OSS so it may be the case :-(
Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search
http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance
Regards
Antonio
> What do others think?
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>
>> Hi *,
>>
>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>>
>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
Re: podling name search
Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
I think this might be a kind of limitation on use Amber as name
http://amber-lang.net/
WDYT?
Regards
Antonio
On Dec 7, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Pid * wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:21, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi .+
>>
>> given the fact that the Newcastle University hasn't submitted the
>> SoftwareGrant for Leelo, Apache Amber and Leeloo are actually two
>> different projects, so I don't think Leelo is a suitable name for the
>> current project since it would create a name collision.
>
> Correct.
> If we can't use Amber we'll need a new name.
>
>
> p
>
>> Anyone else maybe knows more?
>> best,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Maciej Machulak
>> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It would be great to change name to the original one - i.e. Leeloo. Credits
>>> to Lukasz for proposing this name in the first instance :-)
>>>
>>> On 7 December 2012 10:46, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
>>>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
>>>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
>>>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
>>>> What do others think?
>>>> Tommaso
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi *,
>>>>>
>>>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>>>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>>>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>>>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Maciej Machulak
>>> email: maciej.machulak@gmail.com
>>> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
>>> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
Re: podling name search
Posted by Pid * <pi...@pidster.com>.
On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:21, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi .+
>
> given the fact that the Newcastle University hasn't submitted the
> SoftwareGrant for Leelo, Apache Amber and Leeloo are actually two
> different projects, so I don't think Leelo is a suitable name for the
> current project since it would create a name collision.
Correct.
If we can't use Amber we'll need a new name.
p
> Anyone else maybe knows more?
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Maciej Machulak
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It would be great to change name to the original one - i.e. Leeloo. Credits
>> to Lukasz for proposing this name in the first instance :-)
>>
>> On 7 December 2012 10:46, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
>>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
>>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
>>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
>>> What do others think?
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>>>
>>>> Hi *,
>>>>
>>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>>>>
>>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Maciej Machulak
>> email: maciej.machulak@gmail.com
>> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
>> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
Re: podling name search
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi .+
given the fact that the Newcastle University hasn't submitted the
SoftwareGrant for Leelo, Apache Amber and Leeloo are actually two
different projects, so I don't think Leelo is a suitable name for the
current project since it would create a name collision.
Anyone else maybe knows more?
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Maciej Machulak
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be great to change name to the original one - i.e. Leeloo. Credits
> to Lukasz for proposing this name in the first instance :-)
>
> On 7 December 2012 10:46, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
>> OSS so it may be the case :-(
>> What do others think?
>> Tommaso
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>>
>> > Hi *,
>> >
>> > some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
>> > check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>> >
>> > I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
>> > might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
>> > So we might need to change the final name... :S
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Antonio
>> >
>> >
>> > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Maciej Machulak
> email: maciej.machulak@gmail.com
> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
Re: podling name search
Posted by Maciej Machulak <ma...@gmail.com>.
It would be great to change name to the original one - i.e. Leeloo. Credits
to Lukasz for proposing this name in the first instance :-)
On 7 December 2012 10:46, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
> OSS so it may be the case :-(
> What do others think?
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
>
> > Hi *,
> >
> > some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
> > check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
> >
> > I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
> > might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
> > So we might need to change the final name... :S
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> >
> > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
>
--
Maciej Machulak
email: maciej.machulak@gmail.com
mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
Re: podling name search
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when
the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one
other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about
OSS so it may be the case :-(
What do others think?
Tommaso
2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>
> Hi *,
>
> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double
> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name.
>
> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name
> might overlap with some other pre-existing software.
> So we might need to change the final name... :S
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards
>
> Antonio
>
>
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12