You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net> on 2015/03/01 14:13:29 UTC

DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received

looks like the timezone is not considered properly

DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received

Received: Sun,  1 Mar 2015 13:49:40 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:32:11 +0200

Re: DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received

Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.

Am 01.03.2015 um 14:23 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> On 01-03-15 14:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> looks like the timezone is not considered properly
>
>> DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received
>
>> Received: Sun,  1 Mar 2015 13:49:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 01 Mar
>> 2015 10:32:11 +0200
>
> 13:49 +01:00 = 12:49 UTC
> 10:32 +02:00 = 08:32 UTC
>
> Difference is 4h17m, which is perfectly between 3 and 6 hours?

hence why i asked and said "looks like"
______________________________________

my wrong calculation :-(

13:49 +01:00 = 14:49 UTC
10:32 +02:00 = 12:32 UTC