You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> on 2007/10/15 22:32:58 UTC

Re: svn commit: r584886 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS


On 10/15/2007 10:13 PM, niq@apache.org wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Mon Oct 15 13:13:39 2007
> New Revision: 584886
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584886&view=rev
> Log:
> New proposal; resolve docs conflict in old proposal.
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=584886&r1=584885&r2=584886&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Mon Oct 15 13:13:39 2007
> @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@
>       I'm OK with that if others feel happier that way.  The function
>       declaration presumably remains in http_protocol.h, so no API change.
>  
> +   * mod_proxy_http: Document environment variables used by this module
> +     http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582476
> +     +1: niq
> +     

Documentation changes need no votes for backporting. So just do it. Anyway I am +1.

Regards

Rüdiger