You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/10 14:33:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-957) JDBC Store should use setBytes API vs using Concat on BLOB

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15861342#comment-15861342 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-957:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1006

    ARTEMIS-957 Use setBytes JDBC API vs Concat BLOB

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-957

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1006.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1006
    
----
commit d4be52fe81986da98b797a3c0b7d9fcd6e78d18a
Author: Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
Date:   2017-02-10T14:27:26Z

    ARTEMIS-957 Use setBytes JDBC API vs Concat BLOB

----


> JDBC Store should use setBytes API vs using Concat on BLOB
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-957
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-957
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Martyn Taylor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)