You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com> on 2013/12/09 05:16:57 UTC
What's new in Storm 0.9.0
http://storm-project.net/2013/12/08/storm090-released.html
Re: What's new in Storm 0.9.0
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Good point. I’ll add a section about the logging changes.
- Taylor
On Dec 8, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jon Logan <jm...@buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Considering the implications of it (we've had issues, and there's been a number of posts about issues), do you think that the switch to Logback should be emphasized more, rather than simply listing it in the changelog? It causes major headaches if you include the log4j adapter in your deployed jar.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://storm-project.net/2013/12/08/storm090-released.html
>
Re: What's new in Storm 0.9.0
Posted by "P. Taylor Goetz" <pt...@gmail.com>.
Good point. I’ll add a section about the logging changes.
- Taylor
On Dec 8, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jon Logan <jm...@buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Considering the implications of it (we've had issues, and there's been a number of posts about issues), do you think that the switch to Logback should be emphasized more, rather than simply listing it in the changelog? It causes major headaches if you include the log4j adapter in your deployed jar.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://storm-project.net/2013/12/08/storm090-released.html
>
Re: What's new in Storm 0.9.0
Posted by Jon Logan <jm...@buffalo.edu>.
Considering the implications of it (we've had issues, and there's been a
number of posts about issues), do you think that the switch to Logback
should be emphasized more, rather than simply listing it in the changelog?
It causes major headaches if you include the log4j adapter in your deployed
jar.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://storm-project.net/2013/12/08/storm090-released.html
>
Re: What's new in Storm 0.9.0
Posted by Jon Logan <jm...@buffalo.edu>.
Considering the implications of it (we've had issues, and there's been a
number of posts about issues), do you think that the switch to Logback
should be emphasized more, rather than simply listing it in the changelog?
It causes major headaches if you include the log4j adapter in your deployed
jar.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://storm-project.net/2013/12/08/storm090-released.html
>