You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2007/03/26 22:02:04 UTC
org.apache.j2g
I asked about this before, but got no answer.
Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g" as
a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other codelines
which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
Why?
--jason
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by "Christopher M. Cardona" <ch...@gmail.com>.
I agree this is inconsistent and I think we need to change this to
something like: o.a.g.tools.j2g or o.a.g.apps.j2g.
Jason Dillon wrote:
> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>
> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g" as a
> package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other codelines
> which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>
> Why?
>
> --jason
>
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Yes, I know its not Mavenized, which is another of my concerns. But
regaurdless of that, it seems fairly simply to just opened up the
project in an IDE, repackage, then search/replace everything else to
pick up the correct package names now...
But... just as long as it gets done soonish, before we start getting
folks using this tool.
--jason
On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
> True, but this thing isn't even mavenized yet. So publishing is
> not a concern for me right now. But I will mark this as a todo.
>
> -sachin
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as
>> we have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or
>> making assemblies then this should be fixed.
>>
>> But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace
>> "org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ? I do this all the
>> time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done
>>> refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time
>>> redoing it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would
>>> have to get changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references,
>>> extension points, etc...
>>>
>>> Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement
>>> before we move it out of sandbox.
>>>
>>> -sachin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>>>>
>>>> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using
>>>> "org.apache.j2g" as a package name? This seems *very*
>>>> inconsistent wrt other codelines which are hosted by the
>>>> geronimo svn.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
True, but this thing isn't even mavenized yet. So publishing is not
a concern for me right now. But I will mark this as a todo.
-sachin
On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as
> we have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or making
> assemblies then this should be fixed.
>
> But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace
> "org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ? I do this all the
> time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>> Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done
>> refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time redoing
>> it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would have to get
>> changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references, extension
>> points, etc...
>>
>> Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement
>> before we move it out of sandbox.
>>
>> -sachin
>>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>>> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>>>
>>> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"
>>> as a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other
>>> codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> --jason
>>
>
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I'm fine to wait to change this a little longer... but as soon as we
have to start producing artifacts, publishing to repos or making
assemblies then this should be fixed.
But is it really that muck work to do a global search and replace
"org.apache.j2g" -> "org.apache.geronimo.j2g" ? I do this all the
time with jEdit... its quite simple and quick.
--jason
On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
> Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done
> refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time redoing
> it all overagain. Its not just the packages that would have to get
> changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references, extension
> points, etc...
>
> Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement
> before we move it out of sandbox.
>
> -sachin
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>>
>> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"
>> as a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other
>> codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> --jason
>
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
Yeah we should insert ".geronimo" before j2g, but I just got done
refactoring alot of stuff and don't want to spend the time redoing it
all overagain. Its not just the packages that would have to get
changed again, but bundle id's, manifest references, extension
points, etc...
Since Its currently in sandbox, we can just make it a requirement
before we move it out of sandbox.
-sachin
On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>
> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"
> as a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other
> codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>
> Why?
>
> --jason
Re: org.apache.j2g
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I'm guessing one day there may be more then just a JBoss converter,
so you may want to go with something like
org.apache.geronimo.convert.jboss. I'm not sure "convert" is best
word... maybe migrate.
-dain
On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I asked about this before, but got no answer.
>
> Why is the code for "geronimo/sandbox/j2g" using "org.apache.j2g"
> as a package name? This seems *very* inconsistent wrt other
> codelines which are hosted by the geronimo svn.
>
> Why?
>
> --jason