You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/04/08 20:46:22 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] AXington commented on a change in pull request #6377: [AIRFLOW-5589] monitor pods by labels instead of names

AXington commented on a change in pull request #6377: [AIRFLOW-5589] monitor pods by labels instead of names
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6377#discussion_r405804227
 
 

 ##########
 File path: airflow/contrib/operators/kubernetes_pod_operator.py
 ##########
 @@ -112,55 +113,54 @@ class KubernetesPodOperator(BaseOperator):  # pylint: disable=too-many-instance-
     """
     template_fields = ('cmds', 'arguments', 'env_vars', 'config_file')
 
+    @staticmethod
+    def create_labels_for_pod(context):
+        """
+        Generate labels for the pod s.t. we can track it in case of Operator crash
+        :param context:
+        :return:
+        """
+        labels = {
+            'dag_id': context['dag'].dag_id,
+            'task_id': context['task'].task_id,
+            'exec_date': context['ts']
 
 Review comment:
   @danccooper @ashb Question about this, I think retry_number would actually be good here... Especially if you are debugging and [kubernetes][delete_worker_pods] is "False". Seems like it would delete the original pod under @danccooper's suggestion and you'd lose that for debugging purposes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services