You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/03/20 13:25:37 UTC

SVN move on March 29th

Hi,

Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat  
Mar 29th to do the SVN move?

I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather  
than interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I  
suggest the infrastructure repository). Carlos - wdyt?

Cheers,
Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: SVN move on March 29th

Posted by Maria Odea Ching <oc...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me :-)
Thanks Brett!

-Deng

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat
> Mar 29th to do the SVN move?
>
> I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
> than interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I
> suggest the infrastructure repository). Carlos - wdyt?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>

Re: SVN move on March 29th

Posted by Joakim Erdfelt <jo...@apache.org>.
+1 to the announced move on March 29th.

Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat Mar 
> 29th to do the SVN move?
> 
> I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather than 
> interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I suggest 
> the infrastructure repository). Carlos - wdyt?
> 
> Cheers,
> Brett
> 
> -- 
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> 

-- 
- Joakim Erdfelt

Re: SVN move on March 29th

Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 21/03/2008, at 12:57 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>
>> Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat
>> Mar 29th to do the SVN move?
>
> Sounds fine.
>
>> I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
>> than interrupt that.
>
> Does someone have a date in mind for that?  I know we don't do formal
> release plans, but a heads up on the dev list would be good.

I got it down to 7 issues - I figured when they got fixed :)

Hoping I'll have the time to do so in the mornings next week.

I guess since 1.1 was timeboxed for end March, getting it ready for  
the TLP move even with the current feature set is not a bad idea  
shortly afterwards too.

- Brett

>
>
> -- 
> Wendy

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: SVN move on March 29th

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:

>  Any objections to me locking in the morning (Australian time) of Sat
>  Mar 29th to do the SVN move?

Sounds fine.

>  I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
>  than interrupt that.

Does someone have a date in mind for that?  I know we don't do formal
release plans, but a heads up on the dev list would be good.

-- 
Wendy

Re: SVN move on March 29th

Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>  I wanted to give it a bit of time so 1.0.2 can go out first rather
>  than interrupt that. We also need to move maven-meeper somewhere (I
>  suggest the infrastructure repository). Carlos - wdyt?

doesnt really matter as long as i have access ;)

>
>  Cheers,
>  Brett
>
>  --
>  Brett Porter
>  brett@apache.org
>  http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>



-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
 -- The Princess Bride