You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Roman Shaposhnik (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/14 23:06:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-543) Apache 2 plugin in proprietary SaaS

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17321791#comment-17321791 ] 

Roman Shaposhnik commented on LEGAL-543:
----------------------------------------

A SaaS company using ALv2 code and NOT distributing a tangible derivate work is NOT subject to a  (4) Redistribution clause and therefore is not forced to provide any information to its users.

> Apache 2 plugin in proprietary SaaS
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-543
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-543
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: Policy Question
>            Reporter: valentin bochatay
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hello,
> What information should a proprietary web application (SaaS) using an apache 2.0 licensed plugin include about the plugin?
> Is a list of plugins with a link and the license name, accessible via the "About" menu, sufficient for the apache 2.0 license?
> Thank you in advance and best regards,



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org