RE: Corrupt fop_0_13 release?

[Arved Sandstrom <Ar...@chebucto.ns.ca>]

Since they're A-OK on my machine at home, both of them, on both Windoze and 
Linux, I guess I got hit by the FTP bug. Either from my work machine 
(machine at work, that is) to my ISP, or from my ISP to locus, they got 
FTP'ed by ASCII. At least this had better be it, since, as I say, the 
originals are fine on my end. :-)

I'll get better copies up tomorrow morning on my next access to locus. More 
attention to what FTP is doing. I confess to some surprise that these files 
didn't get FTP'ed in binary, but it's my bust for not enforcing that.

Arved

P.S. Arghhh.

At 08:54 AM 5/31/00 -0400, COFFMAN Steven wrote:
>Yup. Looks like they are a bit corrupted. On linux, unzip showed about 50%
>of the files had bad zipfile offsets.
>tar xzvf got through the docs/examples/fo directory before it said invalid
>compressed data--format violated
>tar: Child returned status 1
>tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
>
>Arved, could you submit them again?
>-Steve
>

RE: Corrupt fop_0_13 release?

[Dave Pawson <da...@virgin.net>]

Just unzipped 13 successfully.

thanks folks.

Regards, DaveP