You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> on 2017/01/25 11:40:12 UTC
6.4.1
Hi,
Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that includes
these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches
attached to these issues later today and will also look at whether there
are other bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of
building the RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do
not cause problems.
Adrien
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ishan,
LUCENE-7657 is only an issue with caches that use queries as cache keys,
which does not seem to be the case with fingerprinting. So fingerprinting
should be fine since I see it uses weak keys.
Le mer. 25 janv. 2017 à 13:18, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1 for 6.4.1.
>
> Solr's IndexFingerprinting uses
> IndexReader.getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey(). I'm wondering whether that is
> affected by LUCENE-7657?
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:37 PM, jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
> If you need help for the release... ;)
>
>
> 2017-01-25 12:57 GMT+01:00 Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>:
>
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
> >
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> includes
> > these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches
> attached
> > to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other
> > bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building
> the
> > RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause
> > problems.
> >
> > Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 6.4.1.
Solr's IndexFingerprinting uses IndexReader.getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey().
I'm wondering whether that is affected by LUCENE-7657?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:37 PM, jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
> If you need help for the release... ;)
>
>
> 2017-01-25 12:57 GMT+01:00 Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
>> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
>> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
>> >
>> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
>> includes
>> > these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches
>> attached
>> > to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are
>> other
>> > bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building
>> the
>> > RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause
>> > problems.
>> >
>> > Adrien
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>.
+1
If you need help for the release... ;)
2017-01-25 12:57 GMT+01:00 Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
> >
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> includes
> > these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches
> attached
> > to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other
> > bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building
> the
> > RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause
> > problems.
> >
> > Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
>
> These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that includes
> these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches attached
> to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other
> bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building the
> RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause
> problems.
>
> Adrien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
I wrote drafts for the release notes:
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote641
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote641
Please feel free to perform modifications.
Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 12:19, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> You are welcome. I will start building the RC now.
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 12:11, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> Done - thanks!
>
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:15, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This change looks good to include to me too. Please let me know when they
> are backported.
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> SOLR-10054 of course, sorry.
>
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing
> SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the
> other issue?
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but
> had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
You are welcome. I will start building the RC now.
Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 12:11, Andrzej Białecki <
andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
> Done - thanks!
>
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:15, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This change looks good to include to me too. Please let me know when they
> are backported.
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> SOLR-10054 of course, sorry.
>
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing
> SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the
> other issue?
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but
> had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Andrzej Białecki <an...@lucidworks.com>.
Done - thanks!
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:15, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This change looks good to include to me too. Please let me know when they are backported.
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com <ma...@lucidworks.com>> a écrit :
> SOLR-10054 of course, sorry.
>
>> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the other issue?
>>
>> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com <ma...@lucidworks.com>> a écrit :
>> Hi Adrien,
>>
>> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>>
>>> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>>>
>>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>>>
>>> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
>>> > retrieve any keys last night.
>>> >
>>> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
>>> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> is not
>>> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
>>> > not work.
>>> >
>>> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
>>> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>>>
>>> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
>>> >
>>> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
>>> >
>>> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org <ma...@elyograg.org>> a écrit :
>>> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>>> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
>>> > > includes these fixes.
>>> >
>>> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
>>> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
>>> > compatibility would be very safe.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Shawn
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
This change looks good to include to me too. Please let me know when they
are backported.
Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Andrzej Białecki <
andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
> SOLR-10054 of course, sorry.
>
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing
> SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the
> other issue?
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <
> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but
> had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Andrzej Białecki <an...@lucidworks.com>.
SOLR-10054 of course, sorry.
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:05, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the other issue?
>
> Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com <ma...@lucidworks.com>> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>
>> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>>
>> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>>
>> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
>> > retrieve any keys last night.
>> >
>> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
>> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> is not
>> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
>> > not work.
>> >
>> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
>> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>>
>> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
>> >
>> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
>> >
>> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org <ma...@elyograg.org>> a écrit :
>> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
>> > > includes these fixes.
>> >
>> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
>> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
>> > compatibility would be very safe.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shawn
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
I was just going to start so it is not too late. I'm good with pushing
SOLR-10035, however I don't think SOLR-10034 is the correct number for the
other issue?
Le mer. 1 févr. 2017 à 10:50, Andrzej Białecki <
andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
>
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but
> had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Andrzej Białecki <an...@lucidworks.com>.
Hi Adrien,
If it’s not too late, I’d like to include SOLR-10035 and SOLR-10034 too.
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 19:14, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org <ma...@elyograg.org>> a écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Done, thanks!
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:10 AM Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not
> > really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would
> appreciate
> > if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not familiar
> > enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log suggests you
> know
> > about this class, could you have a look?
>
> +1 to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1. Thanks Steve.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not
> really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would appreciate
> if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not familiar
> enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log suggests you know
> about this class, could you have a look?
+1 to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1. Thanks Steve.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Alan Woodward <al...@flax.co.uk>.
Done!
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 09:20, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 Alan
>
> Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 10:19, Alan Woodward <alan@flax.co.uk <ma...@flax.co.uk>> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> I’d like to backport SOLR-10001; it’s just a test bug, but it’s causing failures on the 6.4 Jenkins branch.
>
> Alan Woodward
> www.flax.co.uk <http://www.flax.co.uk/>
>
>
>> On 31 Jan 2017, at 08:21, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would appreciate if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not familiar enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log suggests you know about this class, could you have a look?
>>
>> Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 07:17, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> Hi Adrien,
>>
>> I’d like to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1 - is that ok with you?
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>>
>> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>> >
>> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> > FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>> >
>> > > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
>> > > retrieve any keys last night.
>> > >
>> > > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
>> > > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> is not
>> > > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
>> > > not work.
>> > >
>> > > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
>> > > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve
>> > www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>> >
>> > > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
>> > >
>> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> > > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
>> > >
>> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org <ma...@elyograg.org>> a écrit :
>> > > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>> > > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
>> > > > includes these fixes.
>> > >
>> > > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
>> > > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
>> > > compatibility would be very safe.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Shawn
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 Alan
Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 10:19, Alan Woodward <al...@flax.co.uk> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> I’d like to backport SOLR-10001; it’s just a test bug, but it’s causing
> failures on the 6.4 Jenkins branch.
>
> Alan Woodward
> www.flax.co.uk
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 08:21, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not
> really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would
> appreciate if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not
> familiar enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log
> suggests you know about this class, could you have a look?
>
> Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 07:17, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> I’d like to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1 - is that ok with you?
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues
> but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
> >
> > > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > > retrieve any keys last night.
> > >
> > > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > > not work.
> > >
> > > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> > > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > > includes these fixes.
> > >
> > > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the
> larger
> > > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > > compatibility would be very safe.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Alan Woodward <al...@flax.co.uk>.
Hi Adrien,
I’d like to backport SOLR-10001; it’s just a test bug, but it’s causing failures on the 6.4 Jenkins branch.
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 08:21, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would appreciate if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not familiar enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log suggests you know about this class, could you have a look?
>
> Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 07:17, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> I’d like to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1 - is that ok with you?
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> > FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
> >
> > > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > > retrieve any keys last night.
> > >
> > > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> is not
> > > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > > not work.
> > >
> > > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
> >
> > > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427>. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> > > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <apache@elyograg.org <ma...@elyograg.org>> a écrit :
> > > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > > includes these fixes.
> > >
> > > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > > compatibility would be very safe.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Steve,
The change is small and contained so I wouldn't mind, however I do not
really understand why opening an IndexWriter is an issue. I would
appreciate if someone else could confirm this change is good as I am not
familiar enough with the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. Mike, the git log
suggests you know about this class, could you have a look?
Le mar. 31 janv. 2017 à 07:17, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Adrien,
>
> I’d like to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1 - is that ok with you?
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues
> but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
> tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
> >
> > Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
> >
> > > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > > retrieve any keys last night.
> > >
> > > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > > not work.
> > >
> > > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> > > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> > >
> > > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > > includes these fixes.
> > >
> > > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the
> larger
> > > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > > compatibility would be very safe.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Adrien,
I’d like to include LUCENE-7670 in 6.4.1 - is that ok with you?
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
>
> Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Steve, I had looked at whether there were existing infra issues but
had not thought about looking at their mailing-list. I'll have a look
tomorrow at whether the GPG import succeeded.
Le lun. 30 janv. 2017 à 19:06, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with
> subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
>
> > As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> > retrieve any keys last night.
> >
> > I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> > Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> > as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> > not work.
> >
> > Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> > won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first
> RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that
> issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
> >
> > Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
> > On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > > includes these fixes.
> >
> > The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> > fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> > compatibility would be very safe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
FYI yesterday morning on the users@infra mailing list, sebb posted with subject “committers keys job failed last night”:
> As some of you may have noticed, the committers pgp keys job did not
> retrieve any keys last night.
>
> I made a change to use gpg instead of curl for downloading keys.
> Unfortunately it looks like the gpg version on home.apache.org is not
> as up to date as the version I tested on, and one of the options did
> not work.
>
> Hopefully the code is now fixed to work on the older version, but we
> won't know until tomorrow as the job only runs once a day.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that issue and build a RC once it is resolved.
>
> Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
>
> Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a écrit :
> On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > includes these fixes.
>
> The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> compatibility would be very safe.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
There is an issue with GPG keys that prevents me from building a first RC:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13427. I'll monitor that issue
and build a RC once it is resolved.
Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 16:01, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1 to get the change in if it is safe.
>
> Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a
> écrit :
>
> On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > includes these fixes.
>
> The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> compatibility would be very safe.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 to get the change in if it is safe.
Le jeu. 26 janv. 2017 à 15:59, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> a écrit :
> On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> > includes these fixes.
>
> The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
> fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
> compatibility would be very safe.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 1/25/2017 4:40 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that
> includes these fixes.
The immediate simple fix for SOLR-10035 is a one-liner. Even the larger
fix of including redundant information that preserves backward API
compatibility would be very safe.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: 6.4.1
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
Le mer. 25 janv. 2017 à 14:56, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> a écrit :
> BTW: You should raise the version numbers in the branch to prepare the
> release.
>
Thanks Uwe, I just added the version constants.
RE: 6.4.1
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
I also reenabled the Jenkins tests for 6.4 branch on Jenkins.
BTW: You should raise the version numbers in the branch to prepare the release.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:47 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: 6.4.1
Done.
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: <ma...@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler [ <ma...@thetaphi.de> mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:42 PM
To: <ma...@lucene.apache.org> dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: 6.4.1
+1
I will also backport the Java 8 update 121 issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651). Give me a minute, should be just a simple jerry-pick. Without that we cannot do Jenkins-testing of the release.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: <ma...@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:40 PM
To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> >
Subject: 6.4.1
Hi,
Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that includes these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches attached to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building the RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause problems.
Adrien
RE: 6.4.1
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Done.
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:42 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: 6.4.1
+1
I will also backport the Java 8 update 121 issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651). Give me a minute, should be just a simple jerry-pick. Without that we cannot do Jenkins-testing of the release.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: <ma...@thetaphi.de> uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:40 PM
To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org> >
Subject: 6.4.1
Hi,
Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that includes these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches attached to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building the RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause problems.
Adrien
RE: 6.4.1
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
+1
I will also backport the Java 8 update 121 issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651). Give me a minute, should be just a simple jerry-pick. Without that we cannot do Jenkins-testing of the release.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:40 PM
To: Lucene Dev <de...@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: 6.4.1
Hi,
Two potential memory leaks have been reported recently:
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7647
- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7657
These are annoying bugs so I would like to do a 6.4.1 release that includes these fixes. If this is fine with everyone, I'll commit the patches attached to these issues later today and will also look at whether there are other bug fixes that should be backported. I'm currently thinking of building the RC next Monday to give CI some time to ensure these patches do not cause problems.
Adrien