You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Ellis Teer <te...@sitepen.com> on 2001/04/14 10:09:56 UTC

mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19

I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32.
 
I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. �When I try the LoadModule
command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the mod_jk.dll file the server would not start. �If I comment out that one LoadModule command the server starts.
 
I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. �Is this a change in the Win32 version. �Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll file for Win32?
 
-Ellis Teer

Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19

Posted by eric leung <ch...@yahoo.com>.

I have the same doubt, i use 1.3.17. Why on win32 now,
all module has .so ending?  what i think is .so is for
unix only. am i right?

--- Ellis Teer <te...@sitepen.com> wrote:
> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 +
> mod_jk.dll on Win32.
>  
> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. �When
> I try the LoadModule
> command in the server configuration file on mod_jk
> using the mod_jk.dll file the server would not
> start. �If I comment out that one LoadModule command
> the server starts.
>  
> I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now
> have .so endings. �Is this a change in the Win32
> version. �Do I need a mod_jk.so or different
> mod_jk.dll file for Win32?
>  
> -Ellis Teer
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/