You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2010/02/08 13:02:57 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] New: AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Summary: AFP rendering of bitmap images broke between revs
829021 and 829061
Product: Fop
Version: 1.0dev
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: images
AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
ReportedBy: peter.hancock@gmail.com
This bug manifests when printing.
Attached are afps generated at rev 829021 (ok) and rev 829061 (broken).
The jpgs show scans of the printed output and an error message printed for rev
829061.
The resources used to generate the documents are also attached.
Note that changes were made to the Xml Graphics Commons library at the same
time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #13 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2011-09-28 09:16:04 UTC ---
Final patch committed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1175808&view=rev
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #9 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-02-11 11:45:50 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24970)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24970)
A fix
The previous commited fix broke the printing of color images.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Jeremias Maerki <je...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Jeremias Maerki <je...@apache.org> 2010-02-10 00:55:31 UTC ---
Verified and commited. Thanks, Peter.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908394&view=rev
BTW, while testing I found that the JPG in the demo ZIP, when encoded in RGB
mode, comes out wrong (PNG is fine). I don't have time to look more closely at
this right now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #25308|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #12 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-12-23 05:39:49 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26443)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26443)
patch against trunk@1051874
Differences fro mprevious patch:
No IDEStructureParameter for a YCBCR color model is required for 1 bit/pixel
b+w images
The Subtactive IDEStructureParameter should only be set on subtractive images
with bit/pixel > 1
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #1 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-02-08 04:11:35 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24938)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24938)
example of bug
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|AFP rendering of bitmap |[PATCH] AFP rendering of
|images broke between revs |bitmap images broke between
|829021 and 829061 |revs 829021 and 829061
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #2 from Harald G. Henne <af...@web.de> 2010-02-08 06:04:25 UTC ---
Hi,
there is only a small diff between 829021 and 829061
and the resuling print out depends on some printer characteristic.
|829021 |829061
-------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+
IBM Infoprint IP70 | OK | 0420-486 either not valid or not supported|
OCE printer | OK | OK |
| | |
IBM workbench | OK | OK | ver
2.05.04.01
BTB Afp Browser | no image| OK | ver
1.30
ISIS plugin | no image| no image | ISIS
Papyrus AFP Viewer V.7.01/w3
Both writes out a IOCA function set 11 image and 829061 write out an
additional 0x9B IDE Structure parameter.
0x9B: IDE Structure parameter [6]
Flags: 0x00 (- Additive)
(- Gray Coding: off)
Format: 0x01 (RGB)
Reserved: 00 00 00
Size1: 0x08 (8)
Accouding to ioca_S550-1142-00.pdf the only valid format bytes for
IDESZ=8 is
X'02' YCrCb (see Note 2)
X'12' YCbCr (see Note 2)
Note 2:
Notes on parameters used when IDESZ=4 or IDESZ=8:
Grayscale images only. Grayscale IDEs are composed of the Y component only
of the YCrCb or YCbCr color model.
--
dump of revison 829061:
0xD3A8CE: BR Begin Resource [20] (Offset ???)
"RES00002"
Reserved: 00 00
T21: Resource Object Type (R) [8]
ObjType: 0x06 (Image (IOCA) object (retired))
ConData: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
{
0xD3A8FB: BIM Begin Image Object [8] (Offset ???)
"IMG00002"
{
0xD3A8C7: BOG Begin Object Environment Group [8] (Offset ???)
"OEG00002"
{
0xD3A66B: OBD Object Area Descriptor [20] (Offset ???)
T43: Descriptor Position [1]
DesPosID: 0x01 (1)
T4B: Object Area Measurement Units [6]
XoaBase: 0x00 (10 inches)
YoaBase: 0x00 (10 inches)
XoaUnits: 0x0960 (2400)
YoaUnits: 0x0960 (2400)
T4C: Object Area Size [7]
SizeType: 0x02 (2)
XoaSize: 0x0001E0 (480)
YoaSize: 0x0001E0 (480)
0xD3AC6B: OBP Object Area Position [24] (Offset ???)
OAPosID: 0x01 (1)
RGLength: 0x17 (23)
XoaOSet: 0x000000 (0)
YoaOSet: 0x000000 (0)
XoaOrent: 0x0000 (0 degree)
YoaOrent: 0x2D00 (90 degree)
Reserved: 00
XocaOSet: 0x000000 (0)
YocaOSet: 0x000000 (0)
XocaOrent: 0x0000 (0 degree)
YocaOrent: 0x2D00 (90 degree)
RefCSys: 0x00 (origin defined by IPS)
0xD3ABFB: MIO Map IO Image Object [5] (Offset ???)
000 RGLength: 0x0005 (5)
T04: Mapping Option [1]
MapValue: 0x60 (Scale to Fill)
0xD3A6FB: IDD Image Data Descriptor IO [13] (Offset ???)
UnitBase: 0x00 (10 inches)
XResol: 0x02D0 (720)
YResol: 0x02D0 (720)
XSize: 0x0258 (600)
YSize: 0x0258 (600)
0xF7: IOCA Function Set Identification [2]
Category: 0x01 (Function Set identifier)
FcnSet: 0x0B (11)
}
0xD3A9C7: EOG End Object Environment Group [8] (Offset ???)
"OEG00002"
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [8192] (Offset ???)
0xD3EEFB: IPD Image Picture Data IO [7803] (Offset ???)
IPD Image Picture Data IO [360059] (44 combined records)
{
0x70: Begin Segment [0]
0x91: Begin Image Content [1]
ObjType: 0xFF (IOCA Image Object)
0x94: Image Size parameter [9]
UnitBase: 0x00 (10 inches)
HResol: 0x02D0 (720)
VResol: 0x02D0 (720)
HSize: 0x0258 (600)
VSize: 0x0258 (600)
0x95: Image Encoding parameter [2]
CompID: 0x03 (No compression)
RecID: 0x01 (RIDIC (Recording Image Data Inline Coding))
0x96: IDE Size parameter [1]
IDESize: 0x08 (8)
0x9B: IDE Structure parameter [6]
Flags: 0x00 (- Additive)
(- Gray Coding: off)
Format: 0x01 (RGB)
Reserved: 00 00 00
Size1: 0x08 (8)
0x92: Image Data [65535]
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
...
0x92: Image Data [65535]
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
...
0x92: Image Data [65535]
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
77 8B AC FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
...
0x92: Image Data [65535]
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
...
0x92: Image Data [65535]
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 80 D0 D0
D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0
D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 D0 00 00 D0 D0 D0
...
0x92: Image Data [32325]
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
FF FF FF FF FF FF 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
...
0x93: End Image Content [0]
0x71: End Segment [0]
}
}
0xD3A9FB: EIM End Image Object [8] (Offset ???)
"IMG00002"
}
0xD3A9CE: ER End Resource [8] (Offset ???)
"RES00002"
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #3 from Harald G. Henne <af...@web.de> 2010-02-08 06:07:07 UTC ---
sorry the table was messed up:
printer and viewer test
|829021 |829061
-------------------+---------+-------------------------------------------+
IBM Infoprint IP70 | OK | 0420-486 either not valid or not supported|
OCE printer | OK | OK |
| | |
IBM workbench | OK | OK |
BTB Afp Browser | no image| OK |
ISIS plugin | no image| no image |
IBM workbench ver 2.05.04.01
BTB Afp Browser v 1.30
ISIS Papyrus AFP Viewer V.7.01/w3
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #24951|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #5 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-02-08 08:34:50 UTC ---
Thanks for your input, Harald.
Chaging the Format field of the IDE Structure parameter to YCrCb, produced a
desirable printed output. The IDEStructureParameter class defaults this
property to RGB, and it is not set by the process for b+w color images.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #8 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-02-11 11:35:53 UTC ---
The commited fix breaks other functionality
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #4 from Harald G. Henne <af...@web.de> 2010-02-08 06:29:43 UTC ---
Function Set 20 allows using FORMAT X'01' RGB, but my printtest
with a IBM Infoprint IP70 results in the same error:
0420-486: ERROR The actual destiantion reported an OCA self-defining field
code taht is either not valid or not supported.
Unfortunately i do not have a list of all supported 'Function Sets'
of my IP70 or any other printer. Maybe someone of the mailing list
afp-l@topica.com have such information.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #6 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-02-09 03:52:18 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24951)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24951)
Quick fix
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] AFP rendering of bitmap images broke
between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #10 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-03-22 10:54:17 UTC ---
Could a commiter please review the proposed amendments to commit 908394 in
attachment 24970. Commit 24970 introduced a bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48696] [PATCH] AFP rendering of bitmap images
broke between revs 829021 and 829061
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #24970|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #11 from Peter Hancock <pe...@gmail.com> 2010-04-16 10:05:53 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25308)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25308)
A revised fix
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.