Re: "field exists" queries and benchmarks

[Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>]

2014-10-31 16:13 GMT+01:00 Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>:

> Hi
>
> Hey this line confused me, too. But this should not be a regression, it
> just misses an "Optimization", right? This might explain why he sees no
> real performance.
>
> The problem of Tomaso: He sees no hits for some documents in
> TermRangeQuery/Wildcard: The reason is that empty terms are not *indexed*
> but they appear in *DocValues* - so he sees the difference between the
> queries.
>

I'll try to find out if that's a bug

Tommaso


>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpountz@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:59 PM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: "field exists" queries and benchmarks
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Which version of Lucene?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm using trunk
> >
> > Then it might be due to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6038. Maybe you can try
> > again with the patch applied?
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>