You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-user@db.apache.org by cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org> on 2008/07/27 17:12:35 UTC
Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Hi,
Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac as
the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix it?
thank you,
Gili
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p18677264.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Dy...@Sun.COM.
cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org> writes:
> Is there any way for you to find out the exact JDK (vendor, version) used to
> compile derby.jar?
That is available in the release notes. See
http://db.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.4.1.3.cgi
Look for the "Java 6"/"Compiler" items in the "Build environment" section.
The vendor is Sun Microsystems.
--
dt
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org>.
Is there any way for you to find out the exact JDK (vendor, version) used to
compile derby.jar? The reason I ask is because of
http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
Finding the exact compiler will go a long way in resolving this issue.
Thanks,
Gili
Dyre Tjeldvoll wrote:
>
> cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac
>> as
>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
>> using the Eclipse compiler,
>
> Why do you think so?
>
> The jars were built on a machine that does not have eclipse installed,
> so I very much doubt that eclipse could have been used. The machine runs
> Solaris 10 x86, and as far as I know, eclipse is not even available for
> that
> platform.
>
> The jars were built using the ant commands described on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease?highlight=(Snapshot)|(release)#head-e340693f4c21d10639f13e449b405b8cd128c3f6
>
>
> --
> dt
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p19003248.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Dy...@Sun.COM.
cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac as
> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
> using the Eclipse compiler,
Why do you think so?
The jars were built on a machine that does not have eclipse installed,
so I very much doubt that eclipse could have been used. The machine runs
Solaris 10 x86, and as far as I know, eclipse is not even available for that
platform.
The jars were built using the ant commands described on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease?highlight=(Snapshot)|(release)#head-e340693f4c21d10639f13e449b405b8cd128c3f6
--
dt
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Gili,
I have been told that Dyre is on vacation for a couple weeks. I am
afraid you will have to wait a while for the definitive answer to your
question.
Regards,
-Rick
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Hi Gili,
>
> I have pinged him.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> cowwoc wrote:
>> Can you please refer him to this post?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>>
>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gili,
>>>
>>> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However,
>>> the definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release
>>> manager, Dyre Tjeldvoll.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Rick
>>>
>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>
>>>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>>>
>>>> Gili
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gili,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I
>>>>> built the distributions for the following releases and I did not
>>>>> use Eclipse to build any of these distributions. I believe that
>>>>> the release notes for these distributions accurately reflect the
>>>>> environment that I used:
>>>>>
>>>>> 10.2.1.6
>>>>> 10.2.2.0
>>>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>> -Rick
>>>>>
>>>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>>>> javac
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>>>> built
>>>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thank you,
>>>>>> Gili
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Gili,
I have pinged him.
Regards,
-Rick
cowwoc wrote:
> Can you please refer him to this post?
>
> Gili
>
>
> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>
>> Hi Gili,
>>
>> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the
>> definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager,
>> Dyre Tjeldvoll.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>> cowwoc wrote:
>>
>>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>>
>>> Gili
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Gili,
>>>>
>>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built
>>>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse
>>>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes
>>>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>>>
>>>> 10.2.1.6
>>>> 10.2.2.0
>>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>> -Rick
>>>>
>>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>>> javac
>>>>> as
>>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>>> built
>>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you,
>>>>> Gili
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org>.
Can you please refer him to this post?
Gili
Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>
> Hi Gili,
>
> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the
> definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager,
> Dyre Tjeldvoll.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> cowwoc wrote:
>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>
>> Gili
>>
>>
>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gili,
>>>
>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built
>>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse
>>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes
>>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>>
>>> 10.2.1.6
>>> 10.2.2.0
>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> -Rick
>>>
>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>> javac
>>>> as
>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>> built
>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> thank you,
>>>> Gili
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p18695833.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Gili,
I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the
definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager,
Dyre Tjeldvoll.
Regards,
-Rick
cowwoc wrote:
> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>
> Gili
>
>
> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>
>> Hi Gili,
>>
>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built
>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse
>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes
>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>
>> 10.2.1.6
>> 10.2.2.0
>> 10.3.1.4
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> -Rick
>>
>> cowwoc wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac
>>> as
>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>
>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix it?
>>>
>>> thank you,
>>> Gili
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by cowwoc <co...@bbs.darktech.org>.
The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
Gili
Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>
> Hi Gili,
>
> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built
> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse
> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes
> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>
> 10.2.1.6
> 10.2.2.0
> 10.3.1.4
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Rick
>
> cowwoc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac
>> as
>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>
>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix it?
>>
>> thank you,
>> Gili
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p18694007.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Gili,
Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built
the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse
to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes
for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
10.2.1.6
10.2.2.0
10.3.1.4
Hope this helps,
-Rick
cowwoc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac as
> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>
> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix it?
>
> thank you,
> Gili
>