You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com> on 2004/01/02 03:06:47 UTC
Comments please... (Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25828])
Team,
If you have anything to add, please comment on this
issue in Bugzilla. More viewpoints may be good here.
Thanks,
Glen
--- bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
>
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE
> AT
>
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED
> AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25828
>
> [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From glenmazza@yahoo.com
> 2004-01-01 21:36 -------
> Simon,
>
> Thanks for your explanation again. The problem
> you're bringing up may actually
> be good news for us though: J2SDK 1.4 users who run
> FOP from the command line
> *aren't* using the Xalan, Xerces, xml-apis.jar files
> in our lib directory, but
> rather the internal ones of the J2SDK. (I tested
> and confirmed this.)
>
> Indeed, wouldn't you say, the fact that FOP CL has
> been running fine (very few
> complaints, if any) w/1.4's jars for so long would
> help in reducing the FUD
> about removing the XML jars from our distributions
> once we discontinue 1.2 and
> 1.3 support? (I.e., if we redirect the 1.4 SDK to
> the FOP jars, we'll lose
> certainty about how reliable the internal SDK jars
> are--or, learning what the
> actual bugs are.)
>
> Also, for buggy internal XML jars of a current or
> future SDK--this patch would
> help command-line, but not embedded usage (they
> would still use internal, or
> whatever is placed in SDK default endorsed
> directory). So in these cases where
> the internal jars are bad, wouldn't it be better if
> we had instructions on our
> website, or a link somewhere, telling users how to
> update the XML jars in the
> default Java endorsed directory? That would cover
> both CL and embedded.
>
> Sorry for the long post--I'm not certain on this
> either way. Comments? (Also,
> team members, what do you think?)
>
> Thanks again!
> Glen
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/