You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by Rick Poleshuck <Ri...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/10 15:53:16 UTC
Transactions without External Transaction Manager
My use is case is to read from a JMS queue and update two different jdbc
tables with the same datasource. On failure of either update, both database
actions should be rolled back and the message should be sent to a jms
dead.letter queue.
Do I need an external transaction manager to ensure that any messages
received are either processed or end up on the dead.letter queue?
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transactions-without-External-Transaction-Manager-tp5771407.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Transactions without External Transaction Manager
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
Best,
Christian
Am 10.09.2015 15:53 schrieb "Rick Poleshuck" <Ri...@gmail.com>:
> My use is case is to read from a JMS queue and update two different jdbc
> tables with the same datasource. On failure of either update, both database
> actions should be rolled back and the message should be sent to a jms
> dead.letter queue.
>
> Do I need an external transaction manager to ensure that any messages
> received are either processed or end up on the dead.letter queue?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Transactions-without-External-Transaction-Manager-tp5771407.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>