You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> on 2009/02/07 13:54:46 UTC
Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson:
Jackrabbit-trunk-java14 #70)
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Apache Hudson Server
<hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org> wrote:
> [INFO] Error resolving version for 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin':
> Plugin requires Maven version 2.0.9
Hmm, this was an unintended consequence of the new
org.apache.jackrabbit:parent:2 pom.
What's the general opinion on this; should we make Maven 2.0.9 or
higher required for building Jackrabbit, or should we try to keep the
build compatible with earlier Maven versions?
Personally I wouldn't mind making Maven 2.0.9 a requirement.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson:
Jackrabbit-trunk-java14 #70)
Posted by Alexander Klimetschek <ak...@day.com>.
+1 for Maven 2.0.9
It's the latest version, has some ugly maven bugs fixed (finally) and
works well (at least I didn't see any problems with it).
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexander Klimetschek
alexander.klimetschek@day.com
Re: Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson:
Jackrabbit-trunk-java14 #70)
Posted by Thomas Müller <th...@day.com>.
+1 Maven 2.0.9
Regards,
Thomas
Re: Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson:
Jackrabbit-trunk-java14 #70)
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally I wouldn't mind making Maven 2.0.9 a requirement.
Looks like there's a consensus on this, so I'll update the POM to
explicitly require Maven 2.0.9.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson: Jackrabbit-trunk-java14
#70)
Posted by Marcel Reutegger <ma...@gmx.net>.
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Personally I wouldn't mind making Maven 2.0.9 a requirement.
+1
regards
marcel
Re: Maven 2.0.9+ for Jackrabbit (Was: Build failed in Hudson:
Jackrabbit-trunk-java14 #70)
Posted by Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@day.com>.
On 2/7/09, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Apache Hudson Server
> <hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org> wrote:
> > [INFO] Error resolving version for 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin':
> > Plugin requires Maven version 2.0.9
>
> Hmm, this was an unintended consequence of the new
> org.apache.jackrabbit:parent:2 pom.
>
> What's the general opinion on this; should we make Maven 2.0.9 or
> higher required for building Jackrabbit, or should we try to keep the
> build compatible with earlier Maven versions?
>
> Personally I wouldn't mind making Maven 2.0.9 a requirement.
+1 me neither.
regards, toby